Register free! 
Civil - Judgement
[ 2018 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 ]  

 
First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 788   
Title Forum  Year
Sachdeva and Sons Industries (P) Ltd. vs Deputy Registrar of Trade Marks and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 408235]
IPAB 2010
Shashi Sharma vs Bimla Yadav [LexDoc Id : 401123]
HC (Delhi) 2010
Manoj Kumar and Anr. vs Bhagwan Dass @ Bhahmchari [LexDoc Id : 401114]
HC (Delhi) 2010
Walchandnagar Industries Ltd. and Overseas Infrastructure Alliance India (P) Ltd. vs Saraswati Industrial Syndicate Ltd. and Uttam Sucrotech International [LexDoc Id : 400583]
HC (Delhi) 2010
Ranbir Kumar Gugneja vs Continental Engines Ltd. and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 400492]
HC (Delhi) 2010
Akola Janata Commercial Co-op Bank Ltd. vs Raju Natthuji Badhe, Rambhau D. Khedkar, Santosh Punjaji Pohare and Nandkishor Natthuji Badhe [LexDoc Id : 400523]
HC (Bombay) 2010
Rohit Shekhar vs Narayan Dutt Tiwari and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 400493]
HC (Delhi) 2010
Jindal Photo Ltd. vs Jai Mahaveer Colour Lab and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 400487]
HC (Delhi) 2010
UOI vs Chadha Engg. Works [LexDoc Id : 400484]
HC (Delhi) 2010
Karamjit Singh and Ors. vs Nirmal Rani and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 400417]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2010
Joseph John Fernandes @ Shanu Joseph Fernandes and Rachil @ Rachel Fernandes vs Mario Isac Fernandes [LexDoc Id : 400397]
HC (Bombay) 2010
Ajaybhai Sureshchandra Bhatia vs Vikram Silk Mills (P) Ltd. and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 415286]
CLB 2010
S.M. Patel Iron Traders (P) Ltd. vs Sugam Construction (P) Ltd. Summary jurisdiction of company court-Company court not competent to try triable issues in summary jurisdiction-The company court in its summary jurisdiction was not competent to try triable issues. All that it could see was whether the company sought to be woun [LexDoc Id : 409847]
HC (Gujarat) 2010
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. vs Hermonite Associates Ltd. and Anr. Winding up petition: Failure to serve notice on advocates of company-Failure not amounting to fraud-Failure to serve notice on the advocates of the respondent appearing before the DRT would not amount to fraud. It might have been advisable and pruden [LexDoc Id : 402932]
HC (Delhi) 2010
Sanjeev Behl vs Silvertone Motors (P) Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 400346]
HC (Delhi) 2010
Amin Lal and Anr. vs Rajinder Kumar and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 400199]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2010
Mohanlal Ukchand Soni vs Mandakini Ramchandra Shah, Yogesh Ramchandra Shah, Ramesh Ramchandra Shah, Jitesh Ramchandra Shah and Giribala Ashok Shah [LexDoc Id : 400580]
HC (Bombay) 2010
Pacific Basin Ihx (UK) Ltd. vs Ashapura Minechem Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 400404]
HC (Bombay) 2010
Satwant Singh Devgan vs Delhi Development Authority and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 400252]
HC (Delhi) 2010
Krishna and Anr. vs Lala Ram and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 400249]
HC (Delhi) 2010
Holiday Home vs R.P. Kapur (HUF) [LexDoc Id : 400248]
HC (Delhi) 2010
Hemant Verma vs Gulshan Kumar and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 400246]
HC (Delhi) 2010
Shiv Kumar and Anr. vs Gurdas Ram and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 400210]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2010
VIACOM 18 Media (P) Ltd. vs MSM Discovery (P) Ltd.

MSM Discovery (P) Ltd. vs VIACOM 18 Media (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 456679]
TDSAT 2010
Goa Industrial Development Corpn. vs Panta Rama Gaonkar, Chandar Krishna Gaonkar, Anant Sanvlo Gaonkar, Suryaji Shankar Gaonkar, Krishna Babuso Gaonkar, Narayan Sanvlo Gaonkar, Shambhu Raghu Gaonkar (Dead) through L.Rs and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 400289]
HC (Bombay) 2010
 
First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last