Register free! 
Civil - Judgement
[ 2018 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 ]  

 
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 788   
Title Forum  Year
Messer Holdings Ltd. and Goyal MG Gases (P) Ltd. vs Shyam Madanmohan Ruia, Ruia and Co., Shamun (P) Ltd. and Ors. Agreement of preemption-No restriction imposed by agreement on free transferability of shares-An agreement of preemption, even if freely entered into by a shareholder and third party or between shareholders, did not impose a restriction on the [LexDoc Id : 394225]
HC (Bombay) 2010
Madan Lal (Dead) through L.Rs, Krishan Gopal and Manohar Lal Sharma vs Ram Parshad (Dead) through L.Rs [LexDoc Id : 394218]
HC (Delhi) 2010
Pumpkin Studio (P) Ltd. vs S. Harjnder Singh Chadha (HUF) [LexDoc Id : 394164]
HC (Delhi) 2010
Jhagru Ram vs Jagan and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 394139]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2010
Arun Kumar Tantia vs Om Prakash Tantia and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 397589]
HC (Calcutta) 2010
Saraswati (Dead) through L.Rs vs vs Sushila Rani [LexDoc Id : 394219]
HC (Delhi) 2010
Janak Dulari Mehta vs Ramji Dass [LexDoc Id : 394158]
HC (Delhi) 2010
Bhagwan Mukund Asolkar, Vilas Shankar Asolkar and Dattaram Mukund Asolkar vs Nakul Bablo Asolkar, Government of Goa, Deputy Director of Panchayats, Director of Panchayats, Sub-Divisional officer/Deputy Collector, Senior Town Planner and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 394085]
HC (Bombay) 2010
James Joseph vs State of Kerala [LexDoc Id : 394060]
SC 2010
C.S. Mani (Dead) through L.Rs vs B. Chinnasamy Naidu (Dead) through L.Rs Attachment of immovable property-Stay of execution-An attachment of an immovable property effected in execution of a decree would continue until that property was sold and the sale was confirmed unless [LexDoc Id : 393885]
SC 2010
Mohit Kumar vs Himalayan Institute Hospital Trust [LexDoc Id : 393845]
HC (Delhi) 2010
Kirorimal Kashiram Marketing and Agencies (P) Ltd. vs Shree Sita Chawal Udyog Mill Prohibition from copying prominent part of registered trademark-Copying impermissible and leading to deceptive similarity especially whenproduct of both parties same-Copying of a prominent part of a trademark of a person was prohibited, more so, when the same was a registered trademark. Copying of a prominent part [LexDoc Id : 394257]
HC (Delhi) 2010
Aligarh Roller Flour Mills (P) Ltd. and Ram Pal Juneja vs Parvinder Khanna [LexDoc Id : 394161]
HC (Delhi) 2010
Piramal Healthcare Ltd. vs Dia Sorin S.P.A [LexDoc Id : 393661]
HC (Delhi) 2010
Skol Breweries vs Unisafe Technologies [LexDoc Id : 400214]
HC (Delhi) 2010
Mother Dairy Fruits and Vegetables (P) Ltd. and Anr. vs Maa Baisnavi Enterprises and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 398425]
HC (Delhi) 2010
Vinay Rai vs Anil Rai [LexDoc Id : 393625]
HC (Delhi) 2010
Harinder Singh vs Kuldeep Singh and Vijaya Bank [LexDoc Id : 393619]
HC (Delhi) 2010
Delhi Jal Board vs Devender Singh [LexDoc Id : 393617]
HC (Delhi) 2010
Singh Shamsher Rambahal, Gachake Anil Raghunath, Trunal Nivrutti Wagh and Rakesh Parmar vs Election Commissioner and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 393586]
HC (Bombay) 2010
RBI vs CFL Capital Financial Services Ltd. and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 403538]
CLB 2010
Marico Ltd. vs J.K. Enterprises and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 402245]
HC (Calcutta) 2010
Kumarina Investment Ltd. vs Digital Media Convergence Ltd. and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 399654]
TDSAT 2010
Yogesh Kumar vs Begraj [LexDoc Id : 393535]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2010
R.R. Proteins and Agro Ltd. vs Hari Shankar Singhania and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 402246]
HC (Calcutta) 2010
 
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last