Register free! 
Civil - Judgement
[ 2018 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 ]  

 
First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 673   
Title Forum  Year
Renuka Das vs Maya Ganguly and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 368309]
SC 2009
R. Mahalakshmi vs A.V. Anantharaman and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 369799]
SC 2009
Ranjit Kaur vs G.S. Sandhu and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 368420]
HC (Delhi) 2009
Vasudev Shenoy vs Kshemavathy and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 374087]
SC 2009
Govind Goverdhandas Daga and Mohan Brindavan Agrawal vs Field Mining and Ispat Ltd. and Anil Jaydayal Taneja [LexDoc Id : 368212]
HC (Bombay) 2009
Madhavi Investment and Trading (P) Ltd. vs Damodar Vassant Parulekar and Roopali D. Parulekar [LexDoc Id : 368210]
HC (Bombay) 2009
German Homoepathic Distributors (P) Ltd. vs Deutsche Homeopathic-Union DHU Arzneimittel GMBH and Co. KG Winding up-Jurisdiction of Company Court-A winding up order passed by the Single Judge of the Delhi High Court was set aside. The Single Judge, while passing the order, had exceeded the juris [LexDoc Id : 368152]
HC (Delhi) 2009
John Impex (P) Ltd. and Anr. vs Athul Kapur and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 368108]
SC 2009
Southern Asbestos Industries vs CC and CE Entitlement to refund: Duty paid under protest for the period for which claim made-MOU and documents prima facie showing appellants were contractors and allowed to be registered by department as assessees, Impugned judgments rejecting claim set aside, Matter remitted-The appellants had contended before tribunal that they had taken over the mining operation from erstwhile corporations and, therefore, they were entit [LexDoc Id : 419472]
SC 2009
Hathway Cable and Datacom (P) Ltd. vs Banjara Telelinks (P) Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 368506]
HC (Delhi) 2009
Om Prakash and Anr. vs Delhi Development Authority [LexDoc Id : 368504]
HC (Delhi) 2009
National Thermal Power Corpn. Ltd. vs Reliance Industries Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 368045]
HC (Bombay) 2009
Kitply Industries Ltd. vs California Pacific Trading Corpn. Winding up of company-Decree of foreign court-Proceeding under s.439 of the Companies Act 1956 was not a proceeding for execution of a decree. Consequently, the objections raised by the appellant [LexDoc Id : 376931]
HC (Gauhati) 2009
Shekhar Kinkhede (Dead) through L.Rs. and Mangala Kinkhede vs Manjudevi Chhawchharia [LexDoc Id : 368147]
HC (Bombay) 2009
Kaushal Chand Misra vs Azar [LexDoc Id : 368606]
HC (Delhi) 2009
Workmen of M.C.D. vs M.C.D. [LexDoc Id : 408503]
HC (Delhi) 2009
Registered Partnership Firm vs Vali Mohammad [LexDoc Id : 374086]
SC 2009
Fiza Developers and Inter-Trade (P) Ltd. vs AMCI Indian (P) Ltd. and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 374052]
SC 2009
Girijan Co-op Corpn. Ltd. vs K. Satyanarayana Rao [LexDoc Id : 374059]
SC 2009
Arjan Singh (Dead) through L.Rs.and Ors. vs Gurdian Singh (Dead) through L.Rs. [LexDoc Id : 368008]
SC 2009
P.K. Palanisamy vs N. Arumugham and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 374074]
SC 2009
Winsome Breweries Ltd. vs City Distributors [LexDoc Id : 367548]
HC (Bombay) 2009
Inderchand Jain (Dead) through L.Rs vs Motilal (Dead) through L.Rs [LexDoc Id : 367465]
SC 2009
Devi Prasad and Ors. vs Vishwa Nath Prasad and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 374044]
SC 2009
Rakesh Bhhatia and Ors. vs Pramod Sharma and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 367386]
HC (Delhi) 2009
 
First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last