| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 220 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Hasmukh Parekh vs Assistant STO and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 430548]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2011 |
Deepa Panels vs State of Kerala
[LexDoc Id : 413914]
|
SC |
2011 |
Addl. CST vs Sehgal Autoriders (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 413642]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2011 |
Ramaniyam Real Estates (P) Ltd. vs Commissioner of Service Tax
[LexDoc Id : 421393]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2011 |
State of Tamil Nadu vs Tvl. Deejay Plastics (P) Ltd.
Second sale exemption: Link between seller and alleged seller not proved-Burden on assessee to prove that sale from existing persons did take place, Order levying penalty upheld, Assessment order set aside-The tribunal rejected the State’s appeal holding that the assessee was entitled to second sale exemption. On appeal, the high court held that when the [LexDoc Id : 419588]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2011 |
First Reality vs ACCT
[LexDoc Id : 429109]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2011 |
Scholors Home Senior Secondary School vs State of Uttarakhand and Anr.
Tax liability on supply of foodstuff to residential students: Tax leviable on sale of taxable goods by dealer where business of sale of those goods was a primary and dominant activity-Incidental activity of supplying foodstuff not business, Petitioner not a dealer since no business carried out and no sale made, Notice proposing assessment on supply of foodstuff quashed-The petitioner had prayed for quashing of the notice for the relevant assessment years and for a direction restraining the respondents from making any [LexDoc Id : 416309]
|
HC (Uttarakhand) |
2011 |
Venus Marketing vs State of Kerala
[LexDoc Id : 429993]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2011 |
Star Metals vs Authority of Clarification and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 425488]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2011 |
Desai Brothers Ltd. vs Addl. Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
[LexDoc Id : 422778]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2011 |
Gitanjali Associates, Punjab Industries and Uttaranchal Iron and Hardware vs State of Uttarakhand and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 416310]
|
HC (Uttarakhand) |
2011 |
B. Arjuna Raja vs State of Kerala
Gross profit addition for estimation of turnover: Addition to purchase value declared by the petitioner himself-Lower than the lowest percentage of gross profit declared by similar dealers adopted, Market value of timber considered, Order accepting estimation of gross profit at 12 percent upheld -The tribunal had accepted the estimation of gross profit at 12 percent based on evidence gathered by the department from similar traders who had decla [LexDoc Id : 419216]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2011 |
Vinco Colour and Ceramics vs State of Karnataka
[LexDoc Id : 427072]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2011 |
C.U. Mathai vs CTO and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 429821]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2011 |
State of Karnataka vs N.K. Agro Oils (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 419844]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2011 |
BIS-NU Chem India (P) Ltd. and Anr. vs State of West Bengal and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 438467]
|
WBTT |
2011 |
Roots Multiclean Ltd. vs STO and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 437048]
|
WBTT |
2011 |
CST vs Dev Enterprises Ltd.
Classification of goods: Plastic footwear-Specific classification of plastic footwear provided by legislature, Footwear not entirely made of plastic, Impugned product not covered by the description of plastic moulded footwear-The high court, on the questions whether the tribunal was justified in construing Schedule Entry C74 to mean footwear predominantly made of plastic an [LexDoc Id : 411743]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2011 |
Hysum Steels vs State of Karnataka
[LexDoc Id : 429463]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2011 |
H.R.S. Agency vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 433473]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2011 |
Maggy Sunny vs State of Kerala
[LexDoc Id : 429384]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2011 |
Supreme Food Industries vs State of Kerala
[LexDoc Id : 425440]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2011 |
Nitco Paints Ltd. vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 414385]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2011 |
Prasad Power Control (P) Ltd. and B.P. Yadav vs CST, Deputy Commissioner of Salex Tax, STO, Development Corpn. of Konkan Ltd. and State of Maharashtra
Calculation of cumulative quantum of benefits: Computation on the basis of tax payable by a unit not covered under Package Scheme of Incentives 1988-Rule 31AA directing computation of CQB by ignoring exemption provisions bad in law and repugnant to industrial policy-The high court, on the question whether under paragraph 2.11 of Government Resolution dated 30 September 1988, the cumulative quantum of benefits (CQB [LexDoc Id : 410809]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2011 |
Mohan Hotel (P) Ltd. vs CST
[LexDoc Id : 410666]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2011 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Next | Last |
| |
