Register free! 
Securities Law - Judgement
[ 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 ]  

 
First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 85   
Title Forum  Year
Shilpa Stock Broker (P) Ltd., In re [LexDoc Id : 365748]
SEBI 2005
Hitesh K. Shah Financial Services Ltd. vs UOI SEBI (Stock Brokers and Sub-brokers) Rules 1992-Sub-brokers of regional stock exchange companies-Sub-brokers of subsidiary / company of regional stock exchanges could not be treated as special class of sub-brokers as there was no statutory provisi [LexDoc Id : 304458]
HC (Gujarat) 2005
Satya Prakash Aggarwal vs National Stock Exchange of India Fraudulent investments-Compensation to investors-The National Stock Exchange (NSE) was directed to compensate the investors from its Investors Education and Protection Fund (IPEF) on basis of clause [LexDoc Id : 298549]
HC (Bombay) 2005
Solaris Systems (P.) Ltd vs Oriental Bank of Commerce SARFAESI Act 2002-Provisions of the Act prevail -The fact that the tribunal had passed an order against the petitioner under the Debt Recovery Act did not mean that the borrower had ceased to be the [LexDoc Id : 299371]
HC (Kerala) 2005
JVG Leasing (Securities and Finance) Ltd. and Ors. Winding up-Non compliance with regulatory mechanism of RBI-A NBFC was ordered to be wound-up on account of it's failure to comply with the regulatory mechanism provided under s. 45MC of the RBI Act 1934. Furth [LexDoc Id : 288817]
HC (Delhi) 2005
Ravi Spinning Ltd, Akola and Ors. vs UOI and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 291830]
HC (Bombay) 2005
Niskalp Investments and Trading Co. Ltd. vs Hunduja TMT Ltd. Securities Contracts (Regulations) Act 1956-Spot delivery contract-An agreement for transfer of shares of a company for adequate consideration was not a spot-delivery contract which was the only nature of contract per [LexDoc Id : 328306]
HC (Bombay) 2005
Kesha Appliances (P) Ltd. vs Royal Holdings Services Ltd. Interim relief against allotment of shares-Time barred-An appeal against the Single Judge’s order rejecting the interim relief was dismissed as nearly five years had been elapsed since allotment of cumulat [LexDoc Id : 327742]
HC (Bombay) 2005
In The Matter of: Lazard Asset Management LIC Short Selling-Monetary Penalty-An order that imposed penalty against the noticee for short selling of securities was set aside. Even though there was a violation of 15(3)(a) of SEBI [LexDoc Id : 291108]
SEBI 2005
Keyoor M. Bakshi vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 279865]
SAT Mumbai 2005
Patani Securities (P) Ltd. vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 279864]
SAT Mumbai 2005
Dinesh D. Doshi vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 279862]
SAT Mumbai 2005
Kosha Investments Ltd. vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 281473]
SAT Mumbai 2005
Kosha Investments Ltd. vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 281472]
SAT Mumbai 2005
Rashmi Gem Stock and Shares P.Ltd. vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 281470]
SAT Mumbai 2005
Padmini Technologies vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 278860]
SAT Mumbai 2005
Nipar Financial Services (P) Ltd.,Nitin Hasmukh Parikh,Akshay Ashwin Parikh vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 278859]
SAT Mumbai 2005
Indsec Securities and Finance Ltd. vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 278858]
SAT Mumbai 2005
Guru Teak Investment (P) Ltd. vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 278857]
SAT Mumbai 2005
Chandravadan J. Dalal vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 278856]
SAT Mumbai 2005
Abhilashaa Securities (P) Ltd. vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 278855]
SAT Mumbai 2005
Nath Seeds Ltd. vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 278853]
SAT Mumbai 2005
Himanshu Ajmera vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 278852]
SAT Mumbai 2005
Cydal Investments (P) Ltd. vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 278851]
SAT Mumbai 2005
Advance Hovercrafts and Composites India Ltd. vs SEBI [LexDoc Id : 278850]
SAT Mumbai 2005
 
First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next | Last