| First | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 63 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Mass Trading Co. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 426106]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2011 |
Pee Jay International vs CC
CC vs Pee Jay International
[LexDoc Id : 426670]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2011 |
Champion Photostat Industrial Corpn. vs UOI and Ors.
Non-acceptance of bill of entry lodged under ‘Self’ category: No condition in s.46 that bill of entry to be submitted by importer himself or that importer had to have some educational qualification-Qualification fixed under Public Notice No. 8 dated 12 May 2005 not extendible to importer who wished to import goods by himself-The petitioner challenged the order whereby the bill of entry lodged by it had not been accepted under ‘Self’ category, as the petitioner did not sati [LexDoc Id : 419602]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2011 |
CC vs Natural Stone Exports Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 440089]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2011 |
Sanghi Industries Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 428597]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
CCE vs Bansal Metallic Oxides
[LexDoc Id : 426262]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2011 |
Noble Resources and Trading India (P) Ltd. vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 418137]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2011 |
CC vs Sicpa India Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 429413]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2011 |
Cummins India Ltd. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 429394]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2011 |
CCE and Customs vs N.B.M. Industries
[LexDoc Id : 418659]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2011 |
Sujana Metal Products Ltd. and Prakash Glass and Rubber Works vs CCE
CCE vs Vayhan Air Controls (P) Ltd. and Indian Timber Products Ltd.
Zuari Cements Ltd. vs CC, CE and Service Tax
[LexDoc Id : 416307]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2011 |
New Wave Industries vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 417288]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2011 |
Amar Cold Storage vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 439899]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2011 |
Tulsi Trading Co. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 429034]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
Crescent Shipping Agency India Ltd., In re
[LexDoc Id : 436065]
|
Commr. Appl. |
2011 |
UOI and Anr. vs Himsheel International
Beneficial circular vis-à-vis Oppressive circular-Assessee entitled to claim enforcement of oppressive circular prospectively-A beneficial circular had to be applied retrospectively while oppressive circular had to be applied prospectively. Thus, when the circular was against [LexDoc Id : 413680]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2011 |
Carmel Exports and Imports vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 426941]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2011 |
Leotex vs UOI
[LexDoc Id : 430479]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2011 |
Euroflax Industries and Anuj Mittal vs UOI, Textile Commissioner and Director General of Foreign Trade
[LexDoc Id : 413734]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2011 |
Tata Communications Ltd. vs UOI and Ors.
Entitlement to SFIS benefits to telecommunications providers: PIC opining foreign exchange earnings earned from optic fibre cables not entitled to SFIS benefits-Task of PIC to interpret Foreign Trade Policy and not to modify or amend the same, DGFT Circular based on PIC’s opinion quashed and set aside-The petitioner had provided dedicated bandwidth services to foreign telecommunication carriers through a continuous optic fibre cable network owned by [LexDoc Id : 413423]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2011 |
Jubilant Organosys Ltd. vs ACCE
[LexDoc Id : 429129]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2011 |
Disco Garments (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs UOI and Ors.
Non-fulfilment of export obligation and failure to achieve value addition as per letter of approval: Allegation of mis-utilisation of imported goods-Non-fulfilment of export obligation and failure to achieve value addition as per letter of approval: Allegation of mis-utilisation of imported goods-The petitioner was required to fulfil export obligation and was to achieve the value addition as per the conditions of approval. However, it failed to [LexDoc Id : 411826]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2011 |
Vodafone Essar Ltd., Vodafone Essar Cellular Ltd., Vodafone Essar Gujarat Ltd. and Vodafone Essar South Ltd. vs UOI, Director General of Foreign Trade, Zonal Joint Director General of Foreign Trade and Ors.
Services to foreign subscribers on roaming facility while in India: Supply of service covered under clause 9.53(ii) of FTP 2004-09-FTP defining both eligibility and entitlement with reference to foreign exchange earned, Foreign exchange earned not defined as remittance of foreign exchange less an outflow-In a situation involving the presence within India of a foreign subscriber who was on a roaming facility while in India and where the foreign subscrib [LexDoc Id : 411841]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2011 |
Essel Mining and Industries Ltd. vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 411581]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2011 |
Shivam International and Ors. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 412677]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2011 |
| |
| First | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next | Last |
| |
