| First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 1035 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
R.U. Import Export (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 395338]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2009 |
CCE vs Vayhan Air Controls (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 389035]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2009 |
Chetan C. Jesrani vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 385486]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2009 |
CC vs S. Alauddin and Shashank Shukla
[LexDoc Id : 393326]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2009 |
CC vs Photo Fax System and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 386800]
|
CESTAT (Calcutta) |
2009 |
J.P.P. Mills (P) Ltd., Pallipalayam Spinners (P) Ltd. and P.K.P.N. Spinning Mills (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 386000]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2009 |
A.D. Dhruva Kumar vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 387212]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2009 |
ESS Kay International vs CC
Condonation of delay: Delay of 73 days in filing appeal-Illness of manager of firm, Difficult for proprietor to institute appeal in his absence, Sufficient cause for delay, Delay condoned, Tribunal directed to decide appeal on merits-The husband of sole proprietor of the appellant-firm, who looked after legal and other matters of the firm in his capacity as the Manager, was ill fro [LexDoc Id : 391437]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2009 |
G.V. Ramesh vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 388631]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2009 |
CC vs Rajnarayan Jwalaprasad
Application for condonation of delay: Delay of 90 days caused in filing application for restoration of appeal-Dismissal not brought to notice of applicant, Delay properly explained, Application allowed-In an application for condonation of delay of 690 days caused in filing application for restoration of appeal, it was submitted that dismissal of appe [LexDoc Id : 399338]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2009 |
Cosmos Trading Co. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 396560]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2009 |
Cargill India (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 395613]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2009 |
Century Star Shipping Ltd. vs CC
Release of tug: Tug incurring demurrage charges since seizure-No division bench constituted in absence of second member, Appeal before tribunal pending, Tug lying idle on high sea and deteriorating day by day, Petitioner directed to deposit redemption fine for release-The petitioner, the owner of a tug, had prayed for a direction upon the customs authorities to release the tug by furnishing a bond in terms of Custom [LexDoc Id : 393912]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2009 |
Parikh Clearing Agency (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 388655]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2009 |
Parikh Cleaning Agency (P) Ltd. vs CC and Vice Versa
[LexDoc Id : 386772]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2009 |
Max Overseas vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 381444]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2009 |
Olympic Woollen Mills vs UOI
[LexDoc Id : 413809]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2009 |
Regent Strips (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 394306]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2009 |
Arani Agro Oil Industries Ltd. vs CCE and C
[LexDoc Id : 392086]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2009 |
Spectrum Fabrics vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 390566]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2009 |
Microsoft India R and D (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 388860]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2009 |
Moosa Chinna Satti Babu, Gosala Appala Raju and Chokka Simhadri vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 388686]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2009 |
Global E-Business Operations (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 387229]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2009 |
Agarwal Metals and Alloys vs CCE and C
[LexDoc Id : 386870]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2009 |
Nava Bharat Enterprises Ltd. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 386827]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2009 |
| |
| First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
