Register free! 
Customs - Judgement
[ 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 ]  

 
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 862   
Title Forum  Year
Champs on Web (P) Ltd. and Dinakar Patel vs CC [LexDoc Id : 425356]
CESTAT (Bangalore) 2011
CC vs Adani Exports Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 422520]
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) 2011
Mohd. Tariq Abbasi vs CCE [LexDoc Id : 435987]
CESTAT (Delhi) 2011
Channa Kranti Kumar vs CC, CE and Service Tax [LexDoc Id : 426105]
CESTAT (Bangalore) 2011
CC vs National Research Centre on Bio Plant Technology [LexDoc Id : 426287]
CESTAT (Delhi) 2011
Monarch Catalyst (P) Ltd. vs CCE [LexDoc Id : 426092]
CESTAT (Mumbai) 2011
Big Apple Mfg. vs CC [LexDoc Id : 426082]
CESTAT (Bangalore) 2011
Customs vs Mohammad Bagour Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act 1985: Statement made under s.67-Conviction not to be based merely on the basis of such statement without any independent corroboration-Conviction should not be based merely on the basis of statement made under s.67 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act 1985 without any [LexDoc Id : 424657]
HC (Delhi) 2011
Tulips vs CC [LexDoc Id : 428882]
CESTAT (Mumbai) 2011
Pee Jay International vs CC

CC vs Pee Jay International
[LexDoc Id : 426670]
CESTAT (Delhi) 2011
Panna Lal Banarasi Das, Pradeep Jain, Sandeep Jain, Laxmikant Agnihotri, Arvind Mishra and Mahesh Prasad Katta vs CCE [LexDoc Id : 421872]
CESTAT (Delhi) 2011
International Research Park Laboratories Ltd. vs CCE [LexDoc Id : 430696]
CESTAT (Mumbai) 2011
Sonam Clock (P) Ltd. vs CCE [LexDoc Id : 427814]
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) 2011
CC vs Craftsman Automation (P) Ltd. Entitlement to benefit of exemption only as per terms of Notification: Re-export allowable only on two contingencies-Reliance on general clause relating to FTP impermissible when import or export covered by specific notification-The importer would be entitled to claim the benefit of exemption from payment of duty only as per the terms of the Notification and not otherwise. The [LexDoc Id : 426075]
HC (Chennai) 2011
CCE vs Sai Sales Corpn. [LexDoc Id : 422638]
CESTAT (Delhi) 2011
Rajiv Kumar Sharma vs CCE [LexDoc Id : 429127]
HC (Delhi) 2011
Champion Photostat Industrial Corpn. vs UOI and Ors. Non-acceptance of bill of entry lodged under ‘Self’ category: No condition in s.46 that bill of entry to be submitted by importer himself or that importer had to have some educational qualification-Qualification fixed under Public Notice No. 8 dated 12 May 2005 not extendible to importer who wished to import goods by himself-The petitioner challenged the order whereby the bill of entry lodged by it had not been accepted under ‘Self’ category, as the petitioner did not sati [LexDoc Id : 419602]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2011
Cantronics Office Equipment (P) Ltd. vs CC [LexDoc Id : 421729]
CESTAT (Mumbai) 2011
Rajendra Purohit vs UOI and 1 [LexDoc Id : 421595]
HC (Gujarat) 2011
Ashok Kumar Avrol vs UOI [LexDoc Id : 433827]
HC (Allahabad) 2011
Navshakti Industries (P) Ltd. vs CC [LexDoc Id : 421101]
CESTAT (Delhi) 2011
CC vs Tallaja Impex [LexDoc Id : 434280]
CESTAT (Bangalore) 2011
Grasim Industries Ltd. vs CC [LexDoc Id : 423065]
CESTAT (Mumbai) 2011
Sowdun Bivi vs State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. Unexplained delay in detention order: Delay resulting in vitiated order-Constitutional obligation of government to consider representation forwarded by detenu without any delay, Representation to be disposed of with utmost promptitude-The high court, considering whether unexplained delay would vitiate the order of detention or not, held that it was a constitutional obligation of the [LexDoc Id : 422586]
HC (Chennai) 2011
Shah Pulp and Paper Mills Ltd. vs UOI and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 420107]
HC (Bombay) 2011
 
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last