| First | Prev | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 862 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Ferromatic Milacron India Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 432506]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
CC vs Panchmahal Steel Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 414129]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
S.J. Fabrics (P) Ltd. vs UOI
Detention of goods: Limitation for issuing notice to showcause running from actual date of detention-Presumption that goods seized in terms of s.110 even if no formal order issued by customs authority-If the consignment of a person was detained, it should be presumed that the goods had been seized in terms of s.110 of the Customs Act 1962 even if no [LexDoc Id : 412931]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2011 |
Ferromatik Milacron India Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 412663]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
Lee-za International vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 412658]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2011 |
Gimpex Ltd., Samir Goenka, Anil Goyal and Ranjit Chaudhari vs CCE, C and Service Tax
[LexDoc Id : 412132]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2011 |
Himatsingka Seide Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 411881]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2011 |
CC vs R.R. Enterprises
[LexDoc Id : 411569]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2011 |
Diamond and Gem Development Corpn. vs UOI
Special Economic Zone: Authorised operations-SEZ deemed to be a territory outside customs area only for undertaking authorised operations-The provisions of s.53(1) of the Special Economic Zones Act 2005 contemplated that the area of a special economic zone was deemed to be a territory ou [LexDoc Id : 409043]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2011 |
Amity Logistics vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 416622]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2011 |
R.K. Shippping (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 414779]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2011 |
Vazir Polymers Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 413183]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
Jai International vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 412662]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
CC vs Kesar Marble and Granites, Kesar Enterprises Ltd., Harish R. Kilachand, Tushar Ruparel, M.R. Swamy, V.K. Rao, Kohinoor Marbles and Granites Ltd., A.A. Marbles and Granit, Mahendra Salecha, Ashok Salecha and Mangalam Granites and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 411431]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2011 |
Ramesh Solanki vs CC, Customs, Excise and Service Tax
[LexDoc Id : 411385]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2011 |
Sukhdeo Singh and Anr. vs CCE and Service Tax and Ors.
Condonation of delay: Power of Commissioner (Appeals) to condone delay-Power akin to power of court under s.5 of Limitation Act 1963-The power given to the Commissioner (Appeals) for condonation of delay of 30 days was akin to the power given to court under s.5 of the Limitation Act [LexDoc Id : 408427]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2011 |
Reliance Industries Ltd. and Atlantic Shipping (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 407784]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2011 |
Abu Jani Sandeep Khosla, In re
[LexDoc Id : 429141]
|
Sett. Comm. |
2011 |
Kishan Lal Chawala vs UOI
Bail application: Import of restricted and prohibited items-Serious allegations levelled against accused, Bail application rejected-The firm of the accused-applicant had imported lead scrap, a restricted item, by misdeclaring the same as zinc scrap ‘saves’ and also huge quantities [LexDoc Id : 413849]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2011 |
Capt. S.S. Sahi vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 418882]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
Asian Copiers, Akshay Khetterpal vs CC and Ors.
Release of goods: Second hand digital multifunction print and copying machines-Direction to petitioner to deposit enhanced value, Respondents directed to release goods forthwith-The respondents had submitted that investigations were being carried on in respect of the import of the second hand digital multifunction print and co [LexDoc Id : 411296]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2011 |
Magra Exports vs Chief CC
[LexDoc Id : 413250]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2011 |
CC vs VBC Industries Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 411734]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2011 |
Neptune Trade Links (P) Ltd. vs CC
Appeal against order of tribunal: Territorial jurisdiction-Order in original passed by Cochin CC challenged before Bangalore tribunal, Reliance on Apex Court judgments for territorial jurisdiction, Both judgments in direct conflict with each other, Reconcilement of judgments not possible-The order in original passed by the Commissioner of Customs, Cochin was challenged by the assessee before the Bangalore tribunal. The tribunal refused [LexDoc Id : 432658]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2011 |
SRK Enterprises vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 423527]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
| |
| First | Prev | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | Next | Last |
| |
