| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 862 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Bhagyam Process and Team International vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 417788]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2011 |
Tejas Arvindbhai Desai vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 414352]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2011 |
Usha Stud and Agricultural Farms (P) Ltd. and Ameeta Mehra vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 418661]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2011 |
CC vs Nisun Enterprises
[LexDoc Id : 416778]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
CC vs Carrara Marbles and Granite Industries
[LexDoc Id : 416777]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
National Organic Chemical Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 411036]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2011 |
Mangal Singh Brothers, Haren Choksey and Namit Naresh Malhotra vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 419940]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2011 |
Ram Singh vs UOI
[LexDoc Id : 419476]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2011 |
CC vs Harinder Singh, Jaswinder Singh, J.S. Garcha, D.V.S. Kapoor and Trilok Singh
[LexDoc Id : 417074]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2011 |
Gemini Sea Air Freight Services vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 419355]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2011 |
Grundfos Pumps India (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 418879]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2011 |
Liberty Oil Mills (P) Ltd. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 410608]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
CCE vs Ashima Dyecot (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 414190]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2011 |
Larsen and Toubro Ltd. and Ors. vs UOI
[LexDoc Id : 413194]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2011 |
Larsen and Toubro Ltd. and L and T Sapura Shipping (P) Ltd. vs UOI, CC, ACC, Addl. CC, Superindentent of Customs, Director General of Hyderocarbons, Oil and Natural Gas Corpn. Ltd. and Deputy CC
[LexDoc Id : 409773]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2011 |
ITC Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 411031]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2011 |
Gujarat Fluoro-chemicals Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 410742]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2011 |
Saurashtra Chemicals Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 415267]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2011 |
CCE vs Sanjida Fabrics
[LexDoc Id : 415139]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2011 |
CCE and Customs vs D.K. Poly Industries
[LexDoc Id : 414374]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2011 |
CC vs Amar Kishore Prasad
Appeal to the high court: Confiscation order set aside-Burden to prove that seized goods was not smuggled lay upon the owner, Statement of carrier not given under atrocity, duress or coercion, Source of acquisition of goods not disclosed by owner, Order setting aside confiscation quashed-The tribunal had held that the statement given by the carrier under s.108 of the Customs Act 1962, which was later retracted by him, had no evidentiar [LexDoc Id : 412654]
|
HC (Patna) |
2011 |
CC vs Tanya Diagnostic Centre and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 409438]
|
SC |
2011 |
CC vs New Heera Sales Corpn. and Anr.
Appeal to the high court: Confiscation and penalty set aside-Burden that goods seized were not smuggled goods proved, No case of customs authority that invoices were not genuine, Appeal dismissed-The high court, considering whether the tribunal justified in not considering the test report though submitted before it while setting aside the order [LexDoc Id : 409323]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2011 |
VAZ Enterprises vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 421764]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2011 |
Mysore Minerals Ltd. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 413392]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2011 |
| |
| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
| |
