| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 862 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Customs vs Dina Aruna Gupta
Non-testing of gold through furnace test: No evidence of goldsmith possessing proficiency in testing gold-Absence of data in testing certificate, Mere marking not taken as proof of gold for origin of gold as markings and labels, Statement of accused having no consequences-The normal test applied for testing gold was furnace test but the same was not applied or resorted to in the present case. There was no evidence on re [LexDoc Id : 414551]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2011 |
Chinta Devi vs Rajesh Arora
Presumption of culpable mental state-Full exoneration of accused by Jt. Secretary, Exoneration order attaining finality, Pending proceedings quashed-The provisions of s.138-A of the Customs Act 1962 required a culpable mental state of the accused. The court would presume the existence of such menta [LexDoc Id : 413679]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2011 |
Carmel Exports and Imports vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 426941]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2011 |
American Power Conversion India (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 418799]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2011 |
Leotex vs UOI
[LexDoc Id : 430479]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2011 |
Vardhman Yarns and Threads Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 419268]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
Dr. Balabhai Nanavati Hospital and Nanavati Hospital Research Centre vs UOI and Ors.
Exemption sought in particular category: No bar to seek benefit of a re-categorisation into another category of the same notification-Rejection of application for re-categorisation on ground that initial categorisation in category 2 specious and unsustainable, Rejection ex-facie contrary to law-The petitioner had challenged the order of Deputy Director General of DGHS whereby it was held that the petitioner failed to fulfil the ‘continuous ob [LexDoc Id : 413733]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2011 |
JBM Auto System (P) Ltd. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 419592]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2011 |
CC vs Indian Petrochemicals Corpn. Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 423393]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2011 |
Hyundai Motor India Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 419008]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2011 |
Big Bag International (P) Ltd. vs CBEC, CC and ACC
Circular challenged belatedly without challenging subsequent circulars, Circular in consonance with HBP and FTP, Allegation of misdeclaration and suppression of facts against petitioner, Petition dismissed-Circular challenged belatedly without challenging subsequent circulars, Circular in consonance with HBP and FTP, Allegation of misdeclaration and suppression of facts against petitioner, Petition dismissed-The third respondent had issued a letter requiring the petitioner, a star export house, to issue bank guarantee for securing the entire duty to be pay [LexDoc Id : 418606]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2011 |
Manasa Impex Services vs CESTAT, CC and CE
[LexDoc Id : 415071]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2011 |
Maapillai Vinayagar Exports vs CESTAT and CCE
[LexDoc Id : 414866]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2011 |
H.K. International vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 423540]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2011 |
Krishna Singh Garbyal, Jagdish Chander Gupta and Ajeet Kumar Gupta vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 418969]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2011 |
CC vs Vee Kay Polycoats Ltd., Sushi Chem and Plastic Industries and Global Associates
[LexDoc Id : 416433]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2011 |
Humboldt Wedag India (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 416779]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2011 |
Jindal Drugs Ltd. vs UOI, CBEC, CC, Deputy Commissioner of Customs, Director General of Foreign Trade and Zonal Joint Director General of Foreign Trade
Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act 1992: Powers of DGFT-Amendment of EXIM Policy beyond the powers of DGFT-The DGFTmight issue directions in matters of procedure or for the proper implementation of the policy and other details incidental to the proper funct [LexDoc Id : 413523]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2011 |
Bhavik K. Shah vs UOI and Ors.
Detention of goods: Fake purchase bills procured to show domestic purchase of plating solution-Description, quantity and value of imported solution mis-declared, Junk material exported to ostensibly complete export obligation, Benefit under CBEC guidelines not available-The petitioner had sought a declaration that detention of certain goods after the expiry of the statutory period of limitation of six months after its [LexDoc Id : 412832]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2011 |
Adishwar Spinners Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 419564]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2011 |
Vijay Marine Services vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 418131]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
Adishwar Spinners Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 415152]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2011 |
Sepco Electric Power Construction Corpn. and Alstom Project India Ltd. vs CESTAT
[LexDoc Id : 414162]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2011 |
Shree Mahavir Textile Mills vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 418089]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2011 |
Amity Logistics vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 417723]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2011 |
| |
| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
| |
