| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 862 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
CC vs Sai Enterprises
[LexDoc Id : 434174]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
Rose Zinc Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 423529]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2011 |
CC and CE vs Lanco Industries Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 422047]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2011 |
Ganesh Steel Rolling Mills Ltd. vs CC
Challenge to show cause notice: Jurisdiction of CC (Preventive)-High court not inclined to impugn the notice since respondents seized of the matter, Respondents to pass appropriate orders-The petitioner had challenged the show cause notice asking the petitioner as to why action should not be taken against it under the Customs Act 1962. [LexDoc Id : 420464]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2011 |
CIT vs T.O. Abraham
[LexDoc Id : 418906]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2011 |
Darshan Singh and Co. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 417674]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2011 |
Aman Cargo (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 417412]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2011 |
Bridge Stone Tyre Mfg. (Thailand), Bridge Stone India, Michelin Shenyang Tire Co. Ltd., Michelin Siam Co. Ltd., Hangzhou Zhongce Rubber Co. Ltd., Tata Motors Ltd. and Zhaoyuan Leo Rubber Co. Ltd. vs DA and Ministry of Finance
[LexDoc Id : 415893]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2011 |
Shree Hari Chemicals Exports Ltd. vs UOI
Personal hearing an empty formality if one person heard and another decided-Order passed by quasi-judicial authority without complying with principles of natural justice invalid-A personal hearing would become an empty formality if one person heard and another decided. An order passed by a quasi-judicial authority without comp [LexDoc Id : 424548]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2011 |
CC vs Kohler India Corpn. (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 423357]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2011 |
CC vs Tata Tetley Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 423233]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2011 |
Integrated Rubian Exports Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 422948]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2011 |
CC vs Tata Tately Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 420528]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2011 |
Umiya PVC Pipes and Fittings (P) Ltd. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 419591]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2011 |
AIA Engg. Ltd. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 419590]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2011 |
Obeetee Textiles (P) Ltd. vs CCE
Appeal to high court: Maintainability of appeal under s.35-G-Appeal against orders passed in appeal by tribunal on or after 01 July 2003 maintainable-The high court, on the question whether the instant appeal against the tribunal’s order dated 04 July 2011 was maintainable in the high court, held th [LexDoc Id : 417067]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2011 |
LCL Logistics India (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 416133]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
Sterling Agro Industries Ltd. vs UOI and Ors.
Jan Chetna vs Ministry of Environment and Forests and Ors.
Manu Jain vs Neerja Shah and Ors.
Bafna Healthcare (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs CCE and Ors.
Order of appellate authority: Order constituting part of cause of action to make writ petition maintainable in high court within whose jurisdiction appellate authority was situated-High court could refuse to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction by invoking the doctrine of forum conveniens, Writ jurisdiction being discretionary not limited or restricted to ground of malafide alone-An order of the appellate authority constituted a part of cause of action to make the writ petition maintainable in the high court within whose jurisd [LexDoc Id : 414267]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2011 |
CCE, Customs and Service Tax vs Vinay Chandra
Appeal to high court: Penalty imposed on ground of misdeclaration in bills of entry set aside-Approval given by Government of India, chartered engineer’s certificate and details in bill of entry identical, Respondent removed from office when machinery removed, Setting aside of penalty upheld, Appeal dismissed-The assessee-company, a 100 percent export oriented unit, had imported certain machinery free of duty after taking necessary permission and observing [LexDoc Id : 428938]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2011 |
ETA General (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 428883]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2011 |
Aishwarya Exports vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 423521]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2011 |
E.T.A. General (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 419961]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2011 |
S.P.M. Trading Madras (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 419607]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2011 |
Kumar Arch Tech (P) Ltd. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 416370]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2011 |
Kavita Phumbhra vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 414482]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2011 |
| |
| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
| |
