| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 817 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Sesa Goa Ltd. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 400756]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2010 |
Anup Engg. Ltd. and V.R. Shah vs UOI
KVSS 1998: Tax arrears arising from warehoused goods-Assessee treated to be in arrears irrespective of nature of duty demanded once liability to pay incurred and determined on or before 31 March 1998-The declaration filed by the petitioners pursuant to the notice issued under s.72 of the Customs Act 1962 was rejected only on the ground that no disp [LexDoc Id : 398136]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2010 |
CC vs Ashwani Kumar Jain and Anr.
Order of tribunal: Penalty set aside-Clear finding of conspiracy given by CC, Impugned order set aside, Matter remitted-The tribunal had fixed the penalty imposed upon first respondent at Rs.1 crore whereas the penalty imposed upon second respondent was set aside. On th [LexDoc Id : 397516]
|
SC |
2010 |
Siddhachalam Exports (P) Ltd. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 402139]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2010 |
CC vs Economic Pharmaceuticals (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 402135]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2010 |
Transworld Plaschem (P) Ltd. and Overseas Polymers (P) Ltd. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 399035]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2010 |
Kankish Exports, In re
[LexDoc Id : 429136]
|
GOI |
2010 |
Sunrise Food Products, In re
[LexDoc Id : 422243]
|
GOI |
2010 |
Department of Customs vs Luke Antony Kocherry
Appeal against acquittal: Scope of interference-Double presumption in favour of accused, Presumption of innocence of accused reinforced, reaffirmed and strengthened by trial court on acquittal-In case of acquittal, there was double presumption in favour of the accused. Firstly, the presumption of innocence was available to him under the fund [LexDoc Id : 403948]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
CC vs Harbour Petrochem Industries (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 400831]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2010 |
India Glycols Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 400034]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2010 |
CC vs Garg Casteels Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 407122]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2010 |
R.R. Enterprises and Ravi Ganeriwal vs CC and CE
[LexDoc Id : 404573]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2010 |
CC vs Sagar Enterprises
[LexDoc Id : 403019]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2010 |
Associated Finishing Agency vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 401422]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2010 |
Marine Container Services vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 400048]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2010 |
Shree Electromelts Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 400036]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2010 |
Agarwalla Timbers (P) Ltd., Mittal Timbers Products (P) Ltd., Variety Lumbers (P) Ltd. and Ashirwad Impex (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 397026]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2010 |
Bhavesh Rajendrabhai Dani vs State of Maharashtra, Medha Gadgil and Superintendent of Prison
[LexDoc Id : 395377]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2010 |
CCE vs Pulse Copier
[LexDoc Id : 403751]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2010 |
Jatin Thakkar vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 401098]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2010 |
Craftsman vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 400047]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2010 |
Arun Gupta vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 400040]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2010 |
Sameer Industries and Ors. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 400015]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2010 |
T.S. Makkar vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 399150]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2010 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
