| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 817 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Bimal Kumar Jain, Ravindra Kumar Singh, Sanjaya Aggarwal, Rajnish Agarwal, Sathya Pal Reddy and Rakesh Agarwal vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 401095]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2010 |
S. Faisal Khan vs Joint Commissioner of Customs and UOI
Recovery of currency: Voluntary statement that currency taken clandestinely on behalf of another person for monetary consideration-No record to show that statement recorded under duress or pressure, Concurrent findings by lower authorities that petitioner not entitled to redemption, Orders cogent and supported by reasons, Petition dismissed-Certain amount of Indian and foreign currency was recovered from the petitioner. Statement under s.108 of the Customs Act 1962 was recorded wherein th [LexDoc Id : 396900]
|
HC (Madras) |
2010 |
CCE vs B.E. Office Automation Products (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 395168]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2010 |
Karnail Singh and Anr. vs Garja Singh and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 403743]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2010 |
Laxmi Marine vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 401287]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2010 |
Arogya Scan and Research Centre (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 399301]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2010 |
CC vs Shamshuddin M.A. Kadar
Confiscation of goods: Statement admitting goods smuggled and Indian currency as sale proceeds of such goods-Retraction of statement after one and half months an afterthought, Statement material piece of evidence against accused, Confiscation upheld-Search was conducted in a hotel whereby goods of foreign origin and also Indian currency of Rs.2,27,100/- were recovered from the hotel room. Since th [LexDoc Id : 395021]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2010 |
Laddan Steel Ware Mfg. Ltd. vs CC
Raising of plea for first time before high court: Request for re-testing of material not accepted-No such plea made before tribunal, Raising of such plea for first time in instant appeal impermissible-The appellant had made a request for re-testing of the material, which was not accepted. However, no such plea was raised before the tribunal. When th [LexDoc Id : 424554]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
Soft Hosiery Mills vs CC and CE
[LexDoc Id : 413808]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2010 |
Sambhav Enterprises and Bhawani Enterprises vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 399737]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2010 |
Mahavir Enterprises vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 399736]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2010 |
Haldia Petrochemicals Ltd. vs CC
Non-availability of Double Member Bench at Kolkata: Inability to pursue remedy-Direction not to give effect to order directing confiscation of goods and imposing penalty till regular bench became available in Kolkata or till stay application proceeded with Double Member Bench whichever was earlier-The petitioner had prayed for a direction upon the respondents not to give effect or further effect to the order in original directing confiscation of [LexDoc Id : 405111]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2010 |
Assistant CC vs Prabhakar Shetty
[LexDoc Id : 402159]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2010 |
Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 401253]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2010 |
Department of Customs vs Shyam Sunder
[LexDoc Id : 398139]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
Lan Eseda Industries Ltd. vs CC
Undervaluation of goods: Prices declared not the transactional value-Price of similar goods imported even higher, Deemed value higher than transaction value, Deemed value to get priority-The appellant had imported computers from a company in Hong Kong. The department, however, alleged that the goods were manufactured by another company [LexDoc Id : 396747]
|
SC |
2010 |
Vijay Mittal, In re
[LexDoc Id : 422244]
|
GOI |
2010 |
CCE vs Fortune Filaments (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 401280]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2010 |
Ritu Agencies vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 399362]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2010 |
HKT Mining (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 400636]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2010 |
CC vs Madhu Sudan Metals
Appeal decided on the basis of wrong concession-Entire order revolving around that concession, Order based on wrong concession set aside, Matter remitted-The tribunal had decided the appeal based on the concession given by the departmental representative that rules had been made permitting mutilation of [LexDoc Id : 409585]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2010 |
Taneja Aerospace and Aviations Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 402145]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2010 |
Prime Textiles Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 401907]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2010 |
CC Drawback Recovery Cell vs Phoenix Cement Ltd.
Drawback allowable on re-export of duty paid goods-Drawback on imported materials used in the manufacture of goods which were exported-There was a distinction between s.74 and s.75 of the Customs Act 1962. The former came into operation when articles were imported, and thereafter re-e [LexDoc Id : 399513]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2010 |
CC and CE vs Aveco Viscomm (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 398763]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2010 |
| |
| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
| |
