| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 1035 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
CC vs Hi-Tech Machinery
[LexDoc Id : 379543]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2009 |
Indoworth India Ltd. vs UOI
[LexDoc Id : 390204]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Jai Prakash Strips Ltd. vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 376693]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Gawar Construction Ltd. vs UOI
[LexDoc Id : 373976]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Parnikka Harvest Floratech Ltd. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 395550]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2009 |
P.P. Suresh vs ACC
[LexDoc Id : 435776]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2009 |
CC vs Leela Scottish Lace (P) Ltd.
Confiscation of improperly imported goods-Non-observance of condition within the time prescribed-The provisions of s.111(o) of the Customs Act 1962 contemplated confiscation of goods, which were exempted from duty subject to a condition. The occas [LexDoc Id : 383823]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
S. Kushalchand and Co. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 380365]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2009 |
Sravani Impex (P) Ltd. vs Addl. Director General Directorate of Revenue and Directorate of Revenue Intelligence Banjara Hills
Confiscation of goods attempted to be improperly exported-Liability of fraudulently exported goods to confiscation-The liability of fraudulently exported goods to confiscation arose, under s.113 of the Customs Act 1962, as soon as the goods were attempted to be exp [LexDoc Id : 378580]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2009 |
CC vs Leela Scottish Lace (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 374124]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Goodlass Nerolac Paints Ltd. vs UOI
Ethyl or Butyl Glycol: Exemption under Notification-Mention of impugned goods in column 2 of Tariff Heading 29.05 typographical error-The petitioner had been denied exemption under Customs Notification No. 39 dated 20 March 1990 on the ground that the impugned goods were classifiable [LexDoc Id : 373887]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Aabhas Spinners (P) Ltd. vs UOI
Extension of time for show cause notice: Non-communication of extension order-Notice granting a week’s time from date of receipt of notice, Extension order passed within four days from receipt, Opportunity of making representation defeated, Period of six months expiring from date of detention of goods-The high court, on the question whether the order dated 23 July 2009 granting extension beyond the period of six months could be passed without commun [LexDoc Id : 401200]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2009 |
Ishwarlal Soni, H.H. Gusani, C.H. Varia and M.H. Patelia vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 385077]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2009 |
Ishwarlal Soni vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 383736]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2009 |
CC vs Anand Mahindra
Penalty: Import without license-Tribunals order upholding confiscation of goods and reducing redemption fine upheld-The high court, considering whether the CESTAT was justified reducing the redemption fine and also setting aside the personal penalty imposed upon the [LexDoc Id : 382438]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
CC vs Vishal Cotspin Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 380371]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2009 |
Changzhou Yongfa Corduroy Co. Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 380360]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2009 |
CC vs Ateq Systems Analytic India (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 388642]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2009 |
Supreme Trading Co. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 388634]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2009 |
C.K. Enterprises vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 384489]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2009 |
K. Rahuman Sait vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 381507]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2009 |
Uplus Batteries (P) Ltd. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 381125]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2009 |
CC vs Timezone Entertainment (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 386901]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2009 |
Y.R. Kumar and Co. vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 385908]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2009 |
Kavi Agro Agency vs CC
[LexDoc Id : 383728]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2009 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
