| First | Prev | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 1707 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Chunduru Siva Ram Krishna and Anr. vs Peddi Ravindra Babu and Anr.
Allegations not making a case of prima facie evidence-Quashing of proceedings-The Supreme Court held that when, at an initial stage, a prosecution was asked to be quashed, the test to be applied by the court was as to whether th [LexDoc Id : 359788]
|
SC |
2009 |
State of Punjab and Ors. vs Paramjit Kaur and Ors.
Matter pending before trial court-Power of the high court-The Supreme Court stated that when the matter was pending adjudication in a trial before a criminal court, the high court should not have made any obs [LexDoc Id : 359780]
|
SC |
2009 |
Rajesh Pandey vs State of Uttar Pradesh
Accusations established by cogent evidence-Effect of minor variations in evidence-The Supreme Court held that the accusations had been established by cogent evidence. Therefore, minor variations in evidence could not affect the cred [LexDoc Id : 359776]
|
SC |
2009 |
M.D. Sonalika International Tractor Ltd. vs Dinesh Sharma and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 377330]
|
SC |
2009 |
Ins. Malhotra vs A. Kriplani and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 359488]
|
SC |
2009 |
Leila David (3) vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 400652]
|
SC |
2009 |
Vijay Kumar vs Assistant Collector of CE and Customs
[LexDoc Id : 396653]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2009 |
Hari vs State of Maharashtra
[LexDoc Id : 377251]
|
SC |
2009 |
T.R. Sachdeva vs Gujral Tools and Forgings
[LexDoc Id : 377181]
|
SC |
2009 |
Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 363794]
|
SC |
2009 |
Vijay Kumar Misra @ Anil vs State of Uttar Pradesh
[LexDoc Id : 359797]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2009 |
Abdulwahab Abdulmajid Baloch vs State of Gujarat
[LexDoc Id : 359516]
|
SC |
2009 |
Indur Kartar Chhugani vs State of Maharashtra, Senior Inspector of Police, Arun Walzade, Mehboob A. Inamdar, Punjab National Bank Ltd., Alok Kulshreshtha, R.I.S. Sidhu, Anil Bhan, Anil Bhan, R. Srinivasan, Bharat Overseas Bank Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 359394]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Jaishree Anant Khandekar vs State of Maharashtra
[LexDoc Id : 359367]
|
SC |
2009 |
Hari vs State of Maharashtra
[LexDoc Id : 359366]
|
SC |
2009 |
Vijay Nathalal Gohil, Pankaj Nathalal Gohil and Mangalben Nathalal Gohil vs State of Maharashtra
[LexDoc Id : 359390]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Jasmine Keshwani vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 377342]
|
SC |
2009 |
Harbans Lal and Ors. vs ROC
Failure to produce records-Prosecution of directors-The criminal complaints filed against the petitioner-directors of the company, for failure to produce the records, were set aside. The company had giv [LexDoc Id : 363957]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2009 |
Shabbir Ahmed Sherkhan vs State of Maharashtra
[LexDoc Id : 359363]
|
SC |
2009 |
P. Subramanian vs State of Tamil Nadu
[LexDoc Id : 377366]
|
SC |
2009 |
State of Maharashtra vs Rajendra Pralhadrao Wasnik
[LexDoc Id : 359959]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Sunair Hotels Ltd. and Anr. vs ROC and Anr.
Purchase by company of shares, etc., of other companies -Time taken for obtaining sanction of government to be excluded-For computing the time required for obtaining the sanction of the government it was necessary for the complainant to have specified the date on which [LexDoc Id : 364948]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2009 |
Intizam Ali vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 359388]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2009 |
Balbir Singh vs State and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 359387]
|
HC (Jammu and Kashmir) |
2009 |
Ajoy Kumar Ghose vs State of Jharkhand and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 359290]
|
SC |
2009 |
| |
| First | Prev | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | Next | Last |
| |
