First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
Documents Found: 1251 |
Title |
Forum |
Year |
Prem Sagar Singla vs State of Punjab and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 398478]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2010 |
Sonu Vithu Gauns and Pandurang Vithu Gauns vs Tukaram Mahadev Gauns
[LexDoc Id : 398469]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2010 |
Comunidade of Nagoa vs Joaquim Joao Carvalho, Trinidade Carvalho, Sucorro Carvalho, Collector and S.D.O., Mamlatdar of Salcette and Administrative Tribunal
[LexDoc Id : 398465]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2010 |
Raju Sharma and Ors. vs UOI and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 398404]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
Uttam Chand vs State of Punjab and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 398394]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2010 |
Roshan Lal vs State of Punjab and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 398393]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2010 |
Mohit Rishi and Ors. vs State of Punjab and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 398389]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2010 |
Mast Ram vs State of Punjab and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 398388]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2010 |
Madan Singh and Ors. vs State of Punjab and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 398387]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2010 |
CCE vs KVR Construction
Mistaken payment of service tax on construction services: Rejection of refund claim on limitation ground-Construction services exempted from payment of service tax not denied by department, Mere payment of amount not authorising department to regularise, validate or retain payment, S.11B inapplicable-The respondent was a construction company. It had paid service tax under a mistaken notion that it was liable to pay even though it was not. The respo [LexDoc Id : 428469]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2010 |
P. Sundararaj and Anr. vs Presiding Officer, Labour Court and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 423265]
|
HC (Madras) |
2010 |
Teddy Exports vs Joint CCE
Availability of alternative remedy-Levy of service tax for services rendered outside India-The petitioner had challenged the notice calling upon it to pay service tax on the educational cess for the relevant period. The high court, on the qu [LexDoc Id : 403335]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2010 |
UOI and Anr. vs Central Administrative Tribunal Chandigarh Bench and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 398386]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2010 |
UOI and Ors. vs A.S. Pillai and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 398369]
|
SC |
2010 |
British India Corpn. Ltd. vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 423276]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2010 |
Nava Bharat Ferro Alloys Ltd. vs Transmission Corpn. of Andhra Pradesh Ltd. and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 404645]
|
SC |
2010 |
Digitek Krida Vikas Sanshodhan Va Shikshan Bahuuddeshiya Sanstha vs State of Maharashtra and Rashtrasanta Tukadoji Maharaj Nagpur University
[LexDoc Id : 398955]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2010 |
Management of the Meter and Instruments (P) Ltd. vs Labour Court and Anr.
Mast Ram vs Management of the Meter and Instruments (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 398206]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2010 |
Ambulance Access Foundation India and Anr. vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 398185]
|
SC |
2010 |
State of Gujarat and Ors. vs Narendrabhai Jethabhai Solanki and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 441799]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2010 |
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board and Anr. vs D. Venktesan and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 441788]
|
HC (Madras) |
2010 |
State of Rajasthan and Anr. vs Bajrang Lal Sharma and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 437463]
|
SC |
2010 |
Prem Kumar and Co. vs East Coast Railway and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 413283]
|
HC (Orissa) |
2010 |
Shakti Me-Dor Ltd. vs CC, CE and Service Tax
Show cause notice-Scope of jurisdiction of and interference by high court-The high court held that unless it was satisfied that the show cause notice was non est writ petitions should not be entertained for the mere asking a [LexDoc Id : 400107]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2010 |
Durgaram Ramrao Chaudhary vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 399164]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2010 |
|
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
|