Register free! 
Constitution - Judgement
[ 2022 | 2021 | 2018 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 ]  

 
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 622   
Title Forum  Year
Raj Kumar and Ors. vs State and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 374636]
HC (Rajasthan) 2008
S. Kasthuri vs Airports Authority of India/National Airports Division and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 372007]
HC (Madras) 2008
OL vs Dayanand and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 349249]
SC 2008
M.M.T.C. Ltd. vs Commissioner of Commercial Tax Writ jurisdiction-Appeal from: Judgement of single judge- Where the writ petition containing a prayer for quashing assessment order, the appeal to the division bench was maintainable. It was in effect writ [LexDoc Id : 349905]
SC 2008
N.V.G.B. Talkies vs District Collector [LexDoc Id : 349752]
HC (Chennai) 2008
UOI and Ors. vs Kundan Rice Mills Ltd. Confiscation-High court deciding the matter finally during an interim hearing-The supreme court set aside the high court's order which during a preliminary hearing of the writ petition held that there was no prima facie case for [LexDoc Id : 349252]
SC 2008
Varadhalakshmi Mills Ltd. vs CCE [LexDoc Id : 367827]
HC (Madras) 2008
Sree Nithyakalyani Textiles Ltd. vs CCE [LexDoc Id : 359867]
HC (Madras) 2008
Vikramsing Jalamsing Walvi and Anr. vs State of Maharashtra and Suresh Damu Bhambre and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 358966]
HC (Bombay) 2008
Vikramsing and Uttam vs State of Maharashtra, State Election Commission Maharashtra State, UOI, Tribal Development Department, Suresh, Tatya and Rahul [LexDoc Id : 348924]
HC (Bombay) 2008
Adivaram Varthagargal Sangam Palani, Rajendra Mudaliar, Peter Alphonse, M. Balamuralikrishna, T.C.A. Srinivasan, Charumathi Purushotham, K. Kuppuswamy, Sulochana Sadasivan, Sitha Govindan, M.L. Gupta, Jitendra Sharma and R. Narayanan vs State of Tamil Nad [LexDoc Id : 349044]
HC (Chennai) 2008
Peninsula Land Ltd. vs Brihan Mumbai Mahanagarpalika and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 361404]
HC (Bombay) 2008
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs Yuvraj Shalikram Rewde and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 361402]
HC (Bombay) 2008
Karnataka State Forest Industries Corpn. vs Indian Rocks [LexDoc Id : 352565]
SC 2008
CCE vs BSBK (P) Ltd. Service tax in a composite contract-Whether a composite contract can be vivisected and parts of the same subject to tax-The Principal bench of the tribunal, held that the decision in the Daelim case may not be entirely correct and referred the matter to a larger bench. [LexDoc Id : 349913]
CESTAT (Delhi) 2008
Abdul Rashid Khan, Abdul Rehman Khan, Shameem Shah and Razia Bano vs Brihanmumbai Mahanagar Palika, Municipal Corprn. and Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authoirty [LexDoc Id : 348721]
HC (Bombay) 2008
Urmila Pravinchandra Malaviya vs State of Maharashtra and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 361420]
HC (Bombay) 2008
Central Hindu Military Social Education Society vs Joint Charity Commissioner and Janlaxmi Co-op. Bank Ltd.

Maharashtra Rashtrabhasha Sabha vs State of Maharashtra, Joint Charity Commissioner and Shantaram Ramchandra Patil
[LexDoc Id : 360515]
HC (Bombay) 2008
Nirmal Singh Kahlon and J.P. Singla and Ors. vs State of Punjab and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 353817]
SC 2008
Delux Colour Lab (P) Ltd. Garg Photo Film, Anurag Photo Lab (P) Ltd. and Anurag Colour Lab vs CCE [LexDoc Id : 349823]
CESTAT (Delhi) 2008
Raghunath Mahadev Kadam vs UOI and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 361405]
HC (Bombay) 2008
Tarun Mishra vs Rajasthan Small Industries Corpn. Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 353194]
HC (Rajasthan) 2008
J.R. Srinivas and Ors. vs Sri Gururaja Enterprises (P) Ltd. and Ors. Challenge to legality of claiming ownership in shares-Only legal heir entitled to challenge legality-The question of first petitioner, being entitled to challenge the legality of the claim for ownership put forth by the second and the fourth responden [LexDoc Id : 392254]
HC (Karnataka) 2008
Larsen and Toubro Employees Association vs State of Haryana and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 355545]
HC (Punjab and Haryana) 2008
UOI vs Classic Credit Ltd. Maintainability of writ petition-Existence of alternative remedy-The High Court held that the writ petition against an order of pre-deposit under s.35 of the FERA Act 1973 was maintainable. The condition precedent f [LexDoc Id : 353935]
HC (Delhi) 2008
 
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last