| First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 410 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Aruna Hotels Ltd. and Ors. vs Kamal Babbar and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 443835]
|
CLB |
2012 |
Aruna Hotels Ltd. and Ors. vs Kamal Babbar and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 443383]
|
CLB |
2012 |
C. Sindhulekha vs Lekha Corporate Securities (P) Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 443035]
|
CLB |
2012 |
N.C. Bakshi vs UOI
[LexDoc Id : 440829]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2012 |
Jer Rutton Kavasmaneck @ Jer Jawahar Thadani and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 442960]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2012 |
SEBI vs Kunnamkulam Paper Mills Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 441355]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2012 |
Growth Avenue Securities (P) Ltd., In re
Kailashsiddhi Promoters (P) Ltd., In re
[LexDoc Id : 439545]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2012 |
Indian Petro Chemicals Corpn. Ltd. vs Air India Ltd., Makrand joshi and UOI
[LexDoc Id : 440605]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2012 |
Eastern India Motion Picture Association EIMPA House vs Manju Tharad and Manoranjan Films
[LexDoc Id : 441288]
|
CAT (Delhi) |
2012 |
Hovel Developers (P) Ltd. and Ors., In re
[LexDoc Id : 443235]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2012 |
Hotel Developers (P) Ltd., In re
ACE HR Services (P) Ltd., In re
Railtech Infraventure (P) Ltd., In re
[LexDoc Id : 439542]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2012 |
Indiabulls Financial Services Ltd., In re
Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd., In re
[LexDoc Id : 443233]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2012 |
Rajkumar Devraj vs Jai Mahal Hotels (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 441289]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2012 |
Bayer Bio Science (P) Ltd. vs State of Maharashtra and Appellate Officer and Commissioner For Agriculture
[LexDoc Id : 440587]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2012 |
Unit Trust of India vs Jagan Nath Sayal and Co.
[LexDoc Id : 440624]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2012 |
Sahara India Real Estate Exchange Corpn. Ltd. and Anr. vs SEBI
Non-compliance of direction to refund amount along with interest to SEBI: Non-submission of documents to SEBI-Direction to appellants to immediately deposit entire amount to SEBI, Time for filing documents extended by a period of 15 days-By an order the appellants had been directed to refund the amounts collected from investors along with interest to SEBI from the date of receipt of su [LexDoc Id : 437931]
|
SC |
2012 |
Mathi Leathers (P) Ltd. vs C. Manoharan and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 443344]
|
CLB |
2012 |
Mathi Leathers (P) Ltd. vs C. Manoharan and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 441530]
|
CLB |
2012 |
Pravin Gada and Anr. vs Central Bank of India and Ors.
Auction of property of company in liquidation: Application for impleadment and for acceptance of bid-Two orders passed on different occasions to see that sale conducted in fair and transparent manner, Reserve price fixed at Rs.5 crores, Maximum price of Rs.5.04 crores fetched despite best efforts, Sale confirmed subject to deposit of further amount-The Supreme Court had issued directions that the property in question was to be put to auction by issuing a public advertisement inviting bids for sal [LexDoc Id : 434567]
|
SC |
2012 |
Pravin Jain vs Diastar Jewellery (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 444032]
|
CLB |
2012 |
V.R. Textiles (P) Ltd., In re and Diya Industries (P) Ltd., In re
Scheme of amalgamation: Objection regarding fairness of share exchange ratio and fixation of same without obtaining any valuation report-Valuation report obtained from chartered engineer and registered valuer, Exchange ratio approved by board of directors and majority shareholders, Same shareholding pattern maintained, No objectionable feature in scheme, Scheme approved-The objection regarding the fairness of share exchange ratio and fixation of the same, without obtaining any valuation report, the high court noted th [LexDoc Id : 440694]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2012 |
Francis Cleetus and Ors. vs Rashtra Deepika Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 444063]
|
CLB |
2012 |
Agnite Education Ltd., In re
Scheme of arrangement: Proposed scheme reasonable, viable and feasible-No objectionable features to negate scheme at threshold stage, Prima facie satisfaction as to bona fide of company and genuineness of scheme, Directions issued to convene meeting-The combined appreciation of various aspects averred in the light of the documents available prima facie showed reasonableness, viability and feasibil [LexDoc Id : 440693]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2012 |
CCT vs OL
[LexDoc Id : 438024]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2012 |
Commision Commercial Tax, Govt. of Madhya Pradesh vs OL
Winding up: Preferential payments-Prevalence of Central legislation over State legislation-The provisions of s.529-A of Companies Act 1956 (a Central legislation) had to override the provisions of s.53 of the M.P. Commercial Tax Act 1994 (a [LexDoc Id : 437488]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2012 |
| |
| First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
