| First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 400 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
A.P. State Financial Corpn. vs UOI and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 364165]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2008 |
Walnut Packaging (P) Ltd. vs Sirpur Paper Mills Ltd. and Anr.
Business liability of subsidiary could not be placed on holding company-Lifting of corporate veil-The high court held that though the first respondent was a holding company of the second respondent till transfer of all its shares that, by itself, c [LexDoc Id : 359823]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2008 |
OL, of Trimline Health and Resort Ltd. vs GSFC and 4
[LexDoc Id : 365960]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2008 |
Ashok Keshavlal Shah vs O.L. of Kengold India Ltd.
Winding up: Avoidance of transfers, etc. after commencement of winding up-Agreement to sell entered after amalgamation null and void, Relief seeking execution of sale document not granted, Application under s.536 rejected-The applicant had supplied oil seeds to a company and an amount was due from it. That company amalgamated with another company, which was ordered to b [LexDoc Id : 409934]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2008 |
A.K. Khaja Ziaudeen and Ors. vs N. Mohamed Mian Rowther Co. (P) Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 361565]
|
CLB |
2008 |
Shaw Wallace and Co. Ltd., In re
[LexDoc Id : 361760]
|
CLB |
2008 |
Vijayalakshmi Insecticides and Pesticides (P) Ltd., In re
[LexDoc Id : 368140]
|
CLB |
2008 |
India Value Fund Advisors (P) Ltd., In re
Reduction of Share Capital-Certification from qualified auditors or chartered accountants called for-In a petition praying for approval for the proposed reduction of share capital of the petitioner-company as resolved by the board of directors of the [LexDoc Id : 363443]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
T.G. Krishnamurthy vs AROC
Non-filing of balance-sheet and profit and loss account-Offence continuing one and not barred by limitation-The high court held that in view of the averments made in the complaint since the offence alleged against the petitioners under s.220 of the Companies [LexDoc Id : 359977]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2008 |
Rashtriya Mill Mazdoor Sangh vs OL
Winding up: Workmens dues-Award of interest to the workmen or employees-The high court, considering whether s.529, s.529A and s.530 of the Companies Act 1956 read with rule 6 and rule 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules 1959 [LexDoc Id : 367229]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
Sesa Industries Ltd., In re
Scheme of amalgamation: Sanction of court-Scheme fair, just and reasonable, not violative of any law or contrary to public interest-The high court approved the scheme of amalgamation by stating that there was nothing unfair in the scheme and in a way it also gave an exit route to t [LexDoc Id : 363674]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
Malwa Strips (P) Ltd. vs Jyoti Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 353662]
|
SC |
2008 |
Pravin S. Shah, In re
Rashtriya Mill Mazdoor Sangh and Ors. vs OL, High Court of Bombay
[LexDoc Id : 353045]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
H.P. State Forest Co. Ltd. vs United India Insurance Co. Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 352797]
|
SC |
2008 |
Sree Sabari Mills vs Revenue Divisional Officer and Ors.
Provident fund dues-Gratuity amount determined-The provident fund dues, under the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act 1952 were not covered by s.22(1) of the Sick Industrial [LexDoc Id : 360558]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2008 |
CIT vs Sain Processing and Weaving Mills (P) Ltd.
Minimum Alternate Tax - Assessment-Computation of: book-profits, Current years depreciate-AY 1990-91. The assessee had not charged the current depreciation to its profit and loss account and had disclosed the fact in the notes annexed to th [LexDoc Id : 353780]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2008 |
Vijay Industries vs NATL Technologies Ltd.
Payment of interest by way of restitution and accretion of capital-Direction to respondent to pay simple interest with specified period-An interest was, inter alia, payable by way of restitution and also by way of accretion on capital. Interest was also payable in terms of the provisio [LexDoc Id : 353695]
|
SC |
2008 |
Anil Sachar and Anr. vs Shree Nath Spinners (P) Ltd. and Ors.
Dishonour of cheque: Prosecution under s.138-Cheque issued by non-party to contract rendering the person issuing it liable to prosecution if the cheque issued for discharge of any debt or other liability bounced-A cheque issued by even a non-party to a contract would render the person issuing it liable to prosecution under s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments A [LexDoc Id : 416346]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2008 |
Dallah Albaraka (Ireland) Ltd. vs Pentasoft Technologies Ltd.
Winding up: Just and equitable ground-Petitioner bound to convince court of availability of alternative remedy-When a petitioner invoked a just and equitable ground under s.443(2) of the Companies Act 1956 to wind up a company, he should convince the court not [LexDoc Id : 393347]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2008 |
K.R. Rajeev Shenoy vs OL
Overriding preferential payments: Workmens dues-Suspension of operations of company due to labour unrest-The situation of the workmen, being confined to the compensatory provision in s.25-O(8) of the 1947 Act, arose only when the undertaking was permitted [LexDoc Id : 379690]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2008 |
Suresh Estate (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs Municipal Corpn. of Greater Mumbai and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 352704]
|
SC |
2008 |
Marigold Leasing India Ltd. vs Shashi Bhushan
[LexDoc Id : 360358]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2008 |
Official Liquidator of Pushpa Synthetic (P) Ltd. vs Diamond Jubilee Co-op Bank Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 362224]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2008 |
Haryana Financial Corpn. vs Dev Papers (P) Ltd. (In Liquidation) and Ors.
Winding up: Leave of court-Decree by civil court after commencement of winding up proceedings-It was well-settled that if any winding up order was passed during the pendency of a suit against the company, and if the suit was continued without o [LexDoc Id : 368904]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2008 |
Sesa Goa Ltd., S. Araki and Ors. vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Offences and Prosecution-Limitation-A complaint filed against the petitioner for failure to list its shares on stock exchange was set aside as it was barred by limitation. The petitioner [LexDoc Id : 352246]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2008 |
| |
| First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
