| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 508 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
S. Kunjithamala vs HVAC Systems (P) Ltd.
Application for impleading various persons in proceedings under s.397 and s.398-Not necessary to implead all persons, Rejection of application by CLB justified-It was not necessary to keep impleading all and sundry persons assuming that such persons were business associates of the company in which the shareho [LexDoc Id : 384810]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2010 |
State of Punjab vs Northland Sugar Complex Ltd.
Winding up: Adjustment of rights of contributories-Proceedings for recovery of dues pending before DRT when winding up order passed, Secured creditors having lien and preference over indicated amount, State Corporation barred from claiming preference over and above secured creditors to release amount-The respondent was dealing in sugarcane products. Since it failed to make payments to farmers, who had supplied the sugarcane to the company, and to a [LexDoc Id : 397312]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2010 |
Rajendrakumar Tekriwal vs Unique Construction (P) Ltd. and Ors.
Vacation of office by directors: Absence in three consecutive meetings-Notice of meetings not given-The appellant and his family members were not present in three consecutive meetings of the board of directors of the company. The specific allegation [LexDoc Id : 393858]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2010 |
Groupe of Chimique Tunisien (GCT) vs BIFR and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 386561]
|
CAT (Delhi) |
2010 |
Balaji Distilleries Ltd., Hiwide Enterprises Ltd., Viki Investment and Properties (P) Ltd. and Mighty Agrotech India Ltd. vs BIFR and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 386559]
|
AAIFR (Delhi) |
2010 |
HMT Ltd. vs N.T. Rahamatulla Khan and Associates
[LexDoc Id : 393720]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2010 |
Rajeev Kapur and Ors. vs Grentex Wools (P) Ltd. and Ors. (No. 2)
[LexDoc Id : 396419]
|
CLB |
2010 |
Rajeev Kapur and Ors. vs Grentex Yarns (P) Ltd. and Ors. (No. 1)
[LexDoc Id : 396411]
|
CLB |
2010 |
Grentex and Co. (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs Rajeev Kapur and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 393813]
|
CLB |
2010 |
Sri Bahubali Cement Ltd. (In Liquidation), In re
Sale of property of company in liquidation-Confirmed sale could be set aside if there was fraud-The court was duty bound to see that the price fetched at the auction was an adequate price even though there was no suggestion of irregularity or fra [LexDoc Id : 392255]
|
HC (Patna) |
2010 |
Dirak Dieter Ramsauer vs S.D. Chakravarthy
Appeal against order of Company Law Board-Appeal only against main order passed by Board on a petition-An appeal under s.10F of the Companies Act 1956 could only be against the main order passed by the Company Law Board on a petition and not against all [LexDoc Id : 387798]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2010 |
Sanjay Suri and Ors. vs State and Anr.
Books of account to be kept by company-Company not liable for contraventions done by directors-A bare perusal of s.209(6) of Companies Act 1956 would show that only directors, officers and employees of the company had been made liable for any co [LexDoc Id : 380791]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
VSL India (P) Ltd. vs V. Manickam Engineers (P) Ltd.
Company when deemed unable to pay its debts-Winding up not a device for recovery of money-Winding up process could not be taken as a device for recovery of money as regards the transactions between the parties. Merely because there was a no [LexDoc Id : 393724]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2010 |
Ishwar Industries Ltd. vs Lakshmi Machine Works Ltd. (No. 2)
Winding up: Inability to pay debts-Appeal challenging the decree ascertaining indebted sum-A company was indebted to the petitioner for certain sum including the interest. Since the ascertained sum as per the decree could not be paid by the [LexDoc Id : 392715]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2010 |
National Dairy Development Board vs UOI, Comptroller and Auditor Genera and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 380916]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
Jer Rutton Kavasmaneck and Anr. vs Gharda Chemicals Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 400852]
|
CLB |
2010 |
Dynasty Developers (P) Ltd., In re
Composite scheme of arrangement: Sanction of court-No opposition from employees of companies and OL to the scheme-The petitioner-companies i.e. the transferor-companies, transferee-companies and demerged-companies, sought for sanction of composite scheme of arrang [LexDoc Id : 384813]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2010 |
Music Choice India (P) Ltd. vs Phonographic Performance Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 380446]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2010 |
Prem Chand Gupta vs State and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 380330]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
Pramod Jain and Ors. vs Golden Tobacco Ltd. and Ors.
Powers of CLB-Power to permit filing of fresh petition-The Bench of the Company Law Board opined that, notwithstanding the principles underlying Order 23 rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code 1908, the Board, [LexDoc Id : 392253]
|
CLB |
2010 |
1. Ashokkumar H. Fulwadhya and Anr., 2. Daulat Kumar H. Fulwadhya vs UOI
Pre-deposit of penalty-Penalty imposable under rule 13 on the person who took CENVAT credit-The petitioners challenged the CESTAT’s order directing the petitioners to pre-deposit 25 percent of the penalty imposed on each of them, they being t [LexDoc Id : 385097]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2010 |
Birds Jute and Exports Ltd. vs OL
[LexDoc Id : 400975]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2010 |
Messrs Anurag Sites vs W.M.I. Cranes Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 379835]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2010 |
SREI Venture Capital Ltd. vs Ramani Ramaswamy and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 393852]
|
CLB |
2010 |
T. Narayanan vs OL and Ors.
Winding up: Sale of properties of company in liquidation-placing any sealed cover, Value of properties in valuation report low, Sale set aside-The OL had been directed to sell the properties of the company in liquidation since certain
sum due to the OL had not been paid. Tenders were invited [LexDoc Id : 393722]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2010 |
| |
| First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last |
| |
