Register free! 
Company Law - Judgement
[ 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 ]  

 
First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | Last
Documents Found: 400   
Title Forum  Year
L.P. Prabhu vs OL [LexDoc Id : 356826]
HC (Kerala) 2008
AMRL International Tech City Ltd. and Anr. vs Infac India Group LLC [LexDoc Id : 356081]
CLB 2008
Vivek Anand Singhania vs State of Assam and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 353279]
HC (Gauhati) 2008
Prabhu vs OL [LexDoc Id : 351409]
HC (Kerala) 2008
Palanisamy and Anr. vs Milka Nutrients (P) Ltd. and Ors. Powers of the CLB-Appeal-An appeal against the CLB’s interim order authorizing the respondent-director to solely operate the bank account was dismissed as clause 41 of the Art [LexDoc Id : 345661]
HC (Chennai) 2008
Srei Infrastructure Finance Ltd., In re Scheme of arrangement-Sanction of court-The high court sanctioned the scheme of arrangement as it had been approved by the requisite majority of shareholders of both the companies and also c [LexDoc Id : 344192]
HC (Calcutta) 2008
G. Siva Ramakrishna and Anr. vs Rusni Distilleries (P) Ltd. Winding up petition-Maintainability-A winding up petition was not maintainable where the disputed debt was an amount paid for allotment of shares. Neither this amount could be treated as [LexDoc Id : 340907]
HC (Andhra Pradesh) 2008
Medisphere Marketing (P) Ltd. vs Medi Trade Medical Trading Winding up petition-Remanded back-The matter was remanded back to the company judge for reconsideration of facts related to any change in assets of the company and rights of the third [LexDoc Id : 340892]
HC (Delhi) 2008
Sujala Pipes (P) Ltd. vs Monarch Pipes Ltd. and Ors. Appeal against BIFR’s order-Ground of limitation-The high court directed the Appellate Authority to consider the appeal against the BIFR’s order on merit because the appeal had been filed well within [LexDoc Id : 339900]
HC (Andhra Pradesh) 2008
Ashok Organic Industries Ltd. and Precision Fasteners Ltd. vs Asset Reconstruction Co. India Ltd. (Arcil) (Intervener) Scheme of arrangement-Reference to BIFR-A scheme of arrangement was rejected as a reference under s.15 of the SICA 1985 had been made to the BIFR. Once the industrial company made a referenc [LexDoc Id : 334534]
HC (Bombay) 2008
Manu Tiling Co. (P) Ltd. vs OL of Arti Agro Industries Ltd. and Ors Offer for purchase of assets of the company-Power of court to reopen sale in interest of justice-The high court asserted that so long as possession was not handed over to the purchaser and the sale deed was not executed, the court by virtue of the [LexDoc Id : 356420]
HC (Gujarat) 2008
LPL Infrastructures Ltd. vs Kumar's Metallurgical Corpn. Ltd. Winding up-Proceedings of District Collector-A possession notice and proceedings initiated by a District Collector with respect to the mortgaged properties of a company and the subsequent handing [LexDoc Id : 339613]
HC (Andhra Pradesh) 2008
SEBI vs Monarch Projects and Finmarkets Ltd. and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 335670]
SAT (Mumbai) 2008
Baywest Power and Energy (P) Ltd. vs Zlpro International Ltd. and Anr. Failure to pay admitted amount after receipt of notice -Winding up order affirmed-In an appeal against the conclusion of the company judge that there was an admitted liability of the respondent-company in accepting of Rs.18,00,000 a [LexDoc Id : 361757]
HC (Karnataka) 2008
M. Rajendra Naidu vs Sterling Holiday Resorts India Ltd. and Ors. Sale of property by company-Doctrine of Indoor management-A plea of the applicant-shareholder of the respondent-company to set aside the sale deed executed by the respondent-company was dismissed as the sale [LexDoc Id : 345167]
HC (Chennai) 2008
Ram Bahadur Thakur Ltd. and Ors. vs Manish Mohan Sharma and Anr. Orders passed in accordance with Supreme Court’s order-No interference warranted-The Supreme Court held that since the orders passed by the high court and the Company Law Board were in pursuance of the order passed by the Supreme C [LexDoc Id : 332407]
SC 2008
ABP (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs United News of India (UNI) and Ors. Oppression and Mismanagement-Single oppressive act-A single allegation against oppression and mismanagement within the affairs of a company was entertained by the CLB since the matter pertained to allo [LexDoc Id : 338410]
CLB 2008
Keventer Agro Ltd. vs OL of Kengold India Ltd. and Anr. Winding up-Rights of the auction-purchaser-A purchaser of a property in court auction of liquidated company’s assets got a clear title over the property. A statutory authority could not demand [LexDoc Id : 353987]
HC (Gujarat) 2008
Southern Udhyans Ltd. (In Liqn.), In re Winding up of company-Powers of liquidator-An OL’s application recalling an order of the court whereby the OL was appointed as provisional liquidator was dismissed as the OL did not have locus [LexDoc Id : 339999]
HC (Andhra Pradesh) 2008
Safe Pack Polymers Ltd. (In Liqn.) vs G. V. N. Raju and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 339998]
HC (Andhra Pradesh) 2008
S.M. Telesys Ltd. Esquire Electronics Inc. [LexDoc Id : 352487]
HC (Rajasthan) 2008
Hemal A. Kanuga vs ROC Non-compliance to the Companies Act 1956-Power of court to grant relief-The High court was justified in restraining the ROC from launching prosecution against the petitioner for minor lapses in observing compliance to the [LexDoc Id : 338692]
HC (Gujarat) 2008
Landes bank Badenwurttemberg vs Nova Petrochemicals Ltd. Sanction of scheme of arrangement-Clubbing of interested and independent creditors-An application objecting clubbing of interested creditors-promoters of the respondent-company with independent creditors in a meeting of unsecured cre [LexDoc Id : 345660]
HC (Gujarat) 2008
V. Sukumar and Ors. vs Srivari Mutual Benefit Finance Ltd. and Ors. Statutory right of shareholders-Access to company records-The shareholder's statutory right to claim copies of the concerned company records, could not be enforced against the legal heirs of a deceased direct [LexDoc Id : 338232]
CLB 2008
Jagdev Prasad Bajaj and Ors. vs Tirrihanah Co. Ltd. Winding up: Inability pay debts-Non-appearance of company in spite of service-In an application filed by the petitioner under s.433, s.434 and s.439 of the Companies Act 1956, the high court noted that for the price of goods, so [LexDoc Id : 359971]
HC (Calcutta) 2008
 
First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | Last