| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 490 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Sutlej Industries Ltd., In, re
Compromise or arrangement-Meetings of equity shareholders-The holding of meeting of equity shareholders of transferee-company was dispensed with as the equity shareholders had already given their consent to t [LexDoc Id : 295421]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2005 |
Sharp Industries Ltd., In re
Jurisdiction of Company Court-Scheme of compromise or arrangement-The Company court had jurisdiction to entertain a petition for sanctioning a scheme of compromise or arrangement to provide the company an opportunity [LexDoc Id : 294393]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2005 |
Damanganga Processors Ltd., In re
Scheme of Arrangement-Sanction of the Court-The application under s.391 and 393 of the Companies Act 1956 was allowed that sought sanction of the scheme of arrangement and to dispense with separ [LexDoc Id : 293410]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2005 |
Abraham Mathew and Anr. vs Sungkai Plantations (P) Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 306191]
|
CLB |
2005 |
K.S.P. Valli vs Richfield Agencies (P) Ltd and Ors.
Oppression and Mismanagement-Relinquishment of interests in company-The petitioner and other consenting shareholders had relinquished their interests in the company through a deed of arrangement and thus, they were not [LexDoc Id : 297206]
|
CLB |
2005 |
Mono Caps (India) vs State Bank of India and Ors.
RBI Guidelines-One time settlement-The petitioner was not eligible for one time settlement, in terms of the RBI guidelines and policies which were applicable only to cases pending befor [LexDoc Id : 295521]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2005 |
U. Krishnan vs Syndicate Bank and Ors.
Recovery of dues in case of continuing guarantee - Period of limitation - A bank’s application for recovery of dues was not barred by limitation because the period of limitation began only from the date of b... [LexDoc Id : 289993]
|
DRAT |
2005 |
Gummadi Aruna and Anr. vs Gummadi Constructions Ltd. and Anr.
Simplified Exit Scheme-Transmission of shares-An application made by the respondent-company under the 'Simplified Exit Scheme' did not absolve the it from registering transmission of shares in the [LexDoc Id : 309414]
|
CLB |
2005 |
Indiacom Ltd. vs Tata Teleservices Ltd. and Ors.
Passing off-Prior usage-Prior usage was an important factor which had to be considered in the matter of maintenance of a claim for passing off. The defendant had established [LexDoc Id : 295818]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2005 |
Kerala State Electricity Board and Anr. vs P.C. Mathukutty and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 306411]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2005 |
Siddharth Soya Products (P.) Ltd., In re
Scheme of amalgamation-Sanction of the Court-The High Court was bound to sanction a scheme of amalgamation/merger where it had been unanimously approved by shareholders and creditors in their mee [LexDoc Id : 297782]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2005 |
Tiruppur Karur Transports (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs T. V. Raju Naidu and Anr.
Oppression and Mismanagement-Jurisdiction of CLB-A civil court could not grant a relief claimed under s.402 of the Companies Act 1956 because only the CLB had the jurisdiction to adjudicate such clai [LexDoc Id : 301140]
|
CLB |
2005 |
AAR BEE Enterprises (P) Ltd. vs Gyan Security Press Ltd.
Settlement of interest-Proper forum-A winding up petition could not be admitted against a company that had failed to pay interest on the principal sum. The interest liability had been di [LexDoc Id : 301138]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2005 |
Tiruppur Transports (P) Ltd and Ors. vs P. Narayanaswamy and Ors.
Jurisdiction of civil court-Corporate veil-There was no merit in the prayer for injunction as the company petition and the civil suit did not have the same matter in issue, nor between the same [LexDoc Id : 297204]
|
CLB |
2005 |
Registrar of Companies vs Elaborate Leasing (P) Ltd.
Offences committed by a company-Code of Criminal Procedure 1973-Offences committed by a company under s. 159 and 220 r.w. s. 162 of the Companies Act 1956 were continuing offences within the meaning of s. 422 of th [LexDoc Id : 330170]
|
HC (Jammu and Kashmir) |
2005 |
Noida Toll Bridge Co. Ltd. vs Secured Creditors of Noida Toll Bridge Co. Ltd.
Compromise and arrangement-Reduction of interest liability-A scheme of arrangement proposed by a petitioner-company for reducing interest liability of deep discount bond from 13.7% to 8.5% was approved as the [LexDoc Id : 329302]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2005 |
Ravi Spinning Ltd, Akola and Ors. vs UOI and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 291830]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2005 |
V. V. Sivaram and Ors. vs Foseco India Ltd.
Infringement of copyright-Temperory Injunction-A temporary injunction issued against the appellants, restraining it from manufacturing and marketing a product identical to the respondent's product [LexDoc Id : 301513]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2005 |
R. Easwaran and Ors. vs Eswar Oil Industries (P) Ltd and Ors.
Oppression and Mismanagement-Jurisdiction of CLB-A relief could not be granted by the Company Law Board (CLB) under s.397 and s.398 of the Companies Act 1956 where the matter concerned was not a pres [LexDoc Id : 297207]
|
CLB |
2005 |
Surya Commercials Ltd., Nidhi Commercial Enterprises Ltd., In re
Scheme of amalgamation-Increase in authorized capital-A transferee-company was not required to pay fees for increase in it's authorised capital in order to allot shares to members of the transferor-compan [LexDoc Id : 321227]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2005 |
K. Keerthika Komathi vs Kumbakonam Mutual Benefit Fund Ltd.
Company deposits-Payments before full maturity-The Board of Directors of a non-banking financial company (NBFC) could not alter the terms and conditions of the existing deposit scheme without the d [LexDoc Id : 297432]
|
CLB |
2005 |
Bank of Baroda vs O.L. of Astron Drugs and Indus. Ltd.
Company in Liquidation-Sale of mortgaged property-A property of the company in liquidation mortgaged with the petitioner-bank had been duly purchased by the respondent at a public auction in good fait [LexDoc Id : 296586]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2005 |
S.S. Organics Ltd. and Anr. vs B. Subba Reddy
Jurisdiction of civil court-Parallel relief-The petitioner could not seek relief before the Civil Court on similar grounds on which it had initiated proceedings before the CLB. No civil court w [LexDoc Id : 291478]
|
CLB |
2005 |
Canara Bank vs Vara Trading Co. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 301780]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2005 |
Ramapandiyan and Anr. vs Indian Bank and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 295170]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2005 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
