| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 2459 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
CCE vs Specific Ventil Fabrik
[LexDoc Id : 421360]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2011 |
Ester Industries Ltd. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 434037]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2011 |
CCE vs Jineshwar Malleable and Alloys
[LexDoc Id : 430455]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2011 |
Krishna Maruti Ltd. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 428591]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2011 |
CCE and C vs Dr. Reddy Laboratories Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 425822]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2011 |
CC and CE vs Andhra Pradesh Paper Mills Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 425821]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2011 |
Kasturi Organic Chemicals vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 425503]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2011 |
CCE vs Sushil Packaging
[LexDoc Id : 424982]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2011 |
CCE vs Nirmal Bhandari
[LexDoc Id : 442038]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2011 |
JNM Fibres (P) Ltd. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 433850]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2011 |
CCE vs Wood Motherson Elastomer Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 422308]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2011 |
CCE vs K.V. Arochem Industries and Tipco Industries Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 422046]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2011 |
Essel Propack Ltd. vs CCE
Assessable value: Plastic capsput on plastic tubes-Caps not integral part of assessable value of tubes manufactured and cleared from factory if caps manufactured separately, No clear finding as to whether for the tubes cleared caps were supplied by customers of appellant free of cost, Matter remanded-The tribunal as well as the Supreme Court had been that if the plastic caps, which were put on plastic tubes, were manufactured separately and not in [LexDoc Id : 419550]
|
SC |
2011 |
Orange City Alloys (P) Ltd., Shridhar Castings (P) Ltd., Shiva Steel Industries (Nagpur) Ltd. and Trimurthi Ispat Ltd. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 419137]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2011 |
Kennametal Widia India Ltd. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 442994]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2011 |
TVC Sky Shop Ltd. vs UOI
[LexDoc Id : 442835]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2011 |
Pet Metal (P) Ltd. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 434205]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2011 |
Mohan Singh and Co. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 428545]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2011 |
SKF Technologies India (P) Ltd. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 427293]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2011 |
GNFC Ltd. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 426264]
|
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) |
2011 |
CC and CE vs ITC Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 424978]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2011 |
Slotco Steel Products (P) Ltd. vs CCE
Relevancy of statements under certain circumstances-Statements of witnesses gone into without cross-examination, No opportunity given to assessee to contest and oppose the applicability of s.9D, Direction to re-examine question of application of s.9D-The tribunal had gone into the question of statements of witnesses, which were not cross-examined, and had applied s.9D of the Central Excise Act 1944 [LexDoc Id : 422584]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2011 |
Wrigley India (P) Ltd. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 420293]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2011 |
Shah Pulp and Paper Mills Ltd. vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 420107]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2011 |
CCE vs North India Pre-Stressers
[LexDoc Id : 442998]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2011 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
