| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 2699 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Vijayaa Steels Ltd., Akshay Tulsiyan, S. Ravishankar and Ors. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 408186]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2010 |
Sri Venkateswara Co-op Sugar Factory Ltd. vs CC and CE
[LexDoc Id : 407515]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2010 |
Sunfab; Alba Equipments; K.M. Akhilan, Sunrise Ironing Equipments; R. Baskar, N. Shivakumar and K.M. Akhilan, Sunrise Services vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 406899]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2010 |
Automotive Coaches and Components vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 405115]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2010 |
CCE vs Pepsi Foods Ltd.
Criminal intent or mens rea necessary constituent-Imposition of penalty under s.11AC impermissible if no fraud or suppression or misstatement alleged by revenue-In order to attract the penalty provision under s.11AC of the Central Excise Act 1944 criminal intent or mens rea was a necessary constituent. In the [LexDoc Id : 399571]
|
SC |
2010 |
CCE vs United White Metal Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 421928]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2010 |
CCE, Customs and Service Tax vs Gandhi Fibers
[LexDoc Id : 413814]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2010 |
Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. vs CCE
Refund of illegal duty paid directed-Order directing pre-deposit set aside-The tribunal had directed the appellant to make a pre-deposit of Rs.7.5 crores and recorded a statement of fact that in spite of the prohibition from [LexDoc Id : 409735]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2010 |
RNS Infrastructure Ltd. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 409684]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2010 |
Vindhyachal Air Products (P) Ltd. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 409379]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2010 |
CCE vs Vijay Leasing Co.
[LexDoc Id : 408607]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2010 |
Saritha Sugars Ltd. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 408385]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2010 |
CCE, Customs and Service Tax vs Nissan Thermoware (P) Ltd.
No evidence to indicate clandestine manufacture and removal-Appeal dismissed-The tribunal was justified in holding that the clandestine manufacture and removal of final product by the assessee was not proved in view of absence [LexDoc Id : 408108]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2010 |
Nicholas Piramal India Ltd. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 407250]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2010 |
Salem Cylinders (P) Ltd. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 406338]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2010 |
Pragati India Security Services vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 405657]
|
CESTAT (Delhi) |
2010 |
Khator Fibre and Fabrics Ltd. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 405074]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2010 |
TVS Motor Co. Ltd. vs CCE
[LexDoc Id : 404033]
|
CESTAT (Chennai) |
2010 |
Ericsson India (P) Ltd. vs CC, CE and Service Tax
[LexDoc Id : 403850]
|
CESTAT (Bangalore) |
2010 |
CCE vs Ashida Electronics (P) Ltd. and Sunil Kulkarni
[LexDoc Id : 403298]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2010 |
CCE vs Bajaj Auto Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 402518]
|
CESTAT (Mumbai) |
2010 |
Pradip Kumar Das vs UOI
[LexDoc Id : 401201]
|
CAT (Delhi) |
2010 |
CCE and C vs Sarla Polyster Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 400664]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2010 |
Commissioner vs Suzlon Structures Ltd.
Condonation of delay: Delay in filing brand rate application for drawback because of obtaining EP copy of shipping bills-Rejection of application on ground of failure to prove sufficient cause from making applications not justified, Finding that EP copy not required with application incorrect, Concerned authorities required to adopt a liberal approach in condoning delay-The tribunal had initially noted that the Commissioner was justified in refusing to condone the delay. However, considering that the respondent was un [LexDoc Id : 400388]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2010 |
CCE and C vs Orbit Fabrics Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 400383]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2010 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
