Saibaba Telefilms (P) Ltd. vs UOI
Appeal to CESTAT-Dispensation of pre-deposit-There was dispute as to liability to pay service tax. A penalty of Rs.2.25 crores was levied. On
appeal the Tribunal directed for pre-deposit of Rs.5 [LexDoc Id : 386951]
HC (Bombay)
2010
1. Ashokkumar H. Fulwadhya and Anr., 2. Daulat Kumar H. Fulwadhya vs UOI
Pre-deposit of penalty-Penalty imposable under rule 13 on the person who took CENVAT credit-The petitioners challenged the CESTAT’s order directing the petitioners to pre-deposit 25 percent of the penalty imposed on each of them, they being t [LexDoc Id : 385097]
CCE vs Relaxo International
Allegation of clandestine removal: Demand set aside on ground of lack of evidence-No case against assessee made on simple statement without preparing any document at spot regarding stock checking by officers, Sufficient material lacking to prove clandestine removal, Amount sought to be recovered too meagre, Appeal dismissed-The tribunal, on the question whether statement recorded under s.14 of the Central Excise Act 1944 had sufficient evidentiary value to prove the cland [LexDoc Id : 393904]
Radhey Shyam Gupta vs UOI
Writ petition: Apprehension of harassment by central excise authorities-No relief grantable, Petitioners to approach higher authorities-No relief in a writ petition could be granted merely on apprehension that the central excise authorities might harass the petitioners. The petitioners [LexDoc Id : 392304]
