Register free! 
Central Excise - Judgement
[ 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 ]  

 
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 2517   
Title Forum  Year
Texmaco Ltd. vs CCE [LexDoc Id : 320696]
CESTAT 2006
Vishnu Textiles Ltd. vs CCE [LexDoc Id : 320194]
CESTAT 2006
Jyoti Ltd. vs CCE [LexDoc Id : 318261]
CESTAT (Gujarat) 2006
CCE vs Dee Pee En Corpn. [LexDoc Id : 317867]
CESTAT (Bangalore) 2006
Apar Industries Ltd. vs CCE [LexDoc Id : 326153]
CESTAT 2006
Triveni Engg. and Indus. Ltd. vs CCE [LexDoc Id : 324672]
CESTAT 2006
Kisan Sahkari Chini Mills Ltd. vs CCE [LexDoc Id : 321501]
CESTAT 2006
Cholomandal Marine Fibres vs CCE [LexDoc Id : 321018]
CESTAT 2006
Alu Bond Enterprises vs CCE [LexDoc Id : 320998]
CESTAT (Gujarat) 2006
Surya Coats (P) Ltd. vs CCE [LexDoc Id : 319879]
CESTAT (Gujarat) 2006
I.O.C.L. vs CCE [LexDoc Id : 318371]
CESTAT 2006
Bharat Petroleum Corpn Ltd. vs CCE [LexDoc Id : 309808]
CESTAT 2006
West Coast Ingots (P) Ltd., Balaji Metals vs CCE and Ors. Maintainability of writ petition-Lack of territorial jurisdiction of High Court-A writ petition against an order by the Settlement Commission in Delhi directing the petitioner to pay 10% interest on evasion of excise duty in respe [LexDoc Id : 306569]
HC (Delhi) 2006
Balaji Distilleries Ltd. vs Government of Tamil Nadu and Ors. Amendment imposing penalty-Retrospective effect-An amendment act or a rule that had an effect of imposing penalty could not be made applicable retrospectively. Consequently, a fine could not be impo [LexDoc Id : 316186]
HC (Chennai) 2006
CCE vs Bhaskar Forgings (P) Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 369371]
CESTAT (Calcutta) 2006
Rishabh Dying and Ptg. Mills (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs CCE [LexDoc Id : 326150]
CESTAT (Gujarat) 2006
Suresh Steel Tubes (P) Ltd. vs CCE [LexDoc Id : 324674]
CESTAT 2006
CCE vs Castrol India Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 319377]
CESTAT 2006
BPL Telecom (P) Ltd. vs CC and CE [LexDoc Id : 317872]
CESTAT 2006
Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. vs CCE [LexDoc Id : 317173]
CESTAT 2006
CCE vs Jadia Pipes India Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 317027]
CESTAT 2006
Triveni Chemicals Ltd. vs UOI and Anr. Unjust enrichment-Amendment of s.11B of Central Excise Act 1944-The amendment made to s.11B of the Central Excise Act 1944 requiring the applicant claiming refund to prove that the incidence of duty had been borne [LexDoc Id : 305785]
SC 2006
CCE vs Krishna Keshav Laboratories Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 357507]
CESTAT (Ahmedabad) 2006
Rajshree Cement vs CCE [LexDoc Id : 324790]
CESTAT 2006
Vithal Dyeing and Printing Mills vs CCE [LexDoc Id : 324788]
CESTAT (Gujarat) 2006
 
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last