| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Last |
| Documents Found: 145 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Laxmi Vishnu Textiles vs Indiabulls Credit Servises Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 382099]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
Biocon Ltd. vs Morepen Laboratories Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 382047]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
Suresh Sharma vs Punjab and Sindh Bank and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 403496]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2010 |
National Small Industries Corpn. Ltd. vs Harmeet Singh Paintal
Vicarious liability of directors under s.141 of Negotiable Instruments Act 1881-Necessity of averments in complaint as to how and in what manner the accused was guilty of consent and connivance or negligence and therefore, responsible under s.141(2)-The Supreme Court held that in order to fasten the vicarious liability in accordance with s.141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881, the averment a [LexDoc Id : 385178]
|
SC |
2010 |
Binay Kumar Modi vs State of Jharkhand and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 400310]
|
HC (Jharkhand) |
2010 |
Som Sugandh Industries Ltd. and Anr. vs UOI and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 381408]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
Bharat Commerce Industries Ltd. and Ors. vs AAIFR and Ors.
Order of AAIFR: Order confirming sale on ground that respondents failed to comply with only condition of furnishing of bank guarantee-No jurisdiction to AAIFR to set aside mandatory term of furnishing a bank guarantee, Order set aside, Direction to refund amount to respondents-The AAIFR was not justified in holding that the respondents had failed to comply with only condition of furnishing of bank guarantee, whereas, to the [LexDoc Id : 410959]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2010 |
V. Chakrapani vs State Bank of India and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 398148]
|
HC (Andhra Pradesh) |
2010 |
State of Punjab vs Northland Sugar Complex Ltd.
Winding up: Adjustment of rights of contributories-Proceedings for recovery of dues pending before DRT when winding up order passed, Secured creditors having lien and preference over indicated amount, State Corporation barred from claiming preference over and above secured creditors to release amount-The respondent was dealing in sugarcane products. Since it failed to make payments to farmers, who had supplied the sugarcane to the company, and to a [LexDoc Id : 397312]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2010 |
Ravindra Bhandari vs Indian Bank
[LexDoc Id : 395775]
|
DRAT (Delhi) |
2010 |
Inderjeet Singh vs Federal Bank Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 381156]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
Gaurav Sharma vs Canara Bank
[LexDoc Id : 380757]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
Bhilwara Mahila Urban Co-op. Bank Ltd. vs State Bank of India and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 394482]
|
DRAT (Delhi) |
2010 |
Nagarajaiah and Ors. vs Vijaya Bank and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 394536]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2010 |
Kesao Narayan Patil @ Babasaheb Dhabekar vs State of Maharashtra, Commissioner of Sugar, Director of Sugar & Additional Joint Registrar, Regional Asstt. Director of Sugar, Balaji Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 379923]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2010 |
Chadha Motors and Anr. vs Punjab National Bank and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 398161]
|
DRAT (Delhi) |
2010 |
Amit Jhaveri and Anr. vs Bank of Baroda and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 403107]
|
DRAT (Bombay) |
2010 |
K.G. Subbarama Setty vs Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 394478]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2010 |
Vinedale Distilleries Ltd. and Anr. vs Dena Bank and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 380050]
|
SC |
2010 |
Suresh Jindal and Ors. vs Delhi Financial Corpn. and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 379736]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2010 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Last |
| |
