TVC India (P) Ltd. vs Abn Amro Bank N.V.
Appointment of arbitrator-Bar of limitation-An arbitrator was appointed as the contention of the respondent that the present petition had been barred by limitation was not maintainable. The peri [LexDoc Id : 338477]
Delhi Development Authority vs Anand and Associates
Interference in an award-Conflict with public policy-No scope of interference in an award was warranted in absence of any ground to prove that such award was in conflict with the public policy of India. [LexDoc Id : 337645]
HC (Delhi)
2008
Vijaypower Generators Ltd. vs UOI and Ors.
Challenge to award-Judicial interference-Judicial interference in to an award was unwarranted when it was evident that the findings of the arbitrator were neither arbitrary nor disclosed any [LexDoc Id : 337643]
Ajay Kirti Kumar Dalmia vs Company Law Board and Ors.
Justifiability of rejecting application to refer dispute to arbitration-All parties to proceedings before CLB not parties to arbitration agreement-On a question whether the decision of the Company Law Board rejecting the application to refer dispute to arbitration, amounted to omission to exercis [LexDoc Id : 361756]
HC (Delhi)
2008
Delhi Development Authority vs Madan Construction Co.
Challenge to award-Appeal dismissed-An appeal against an award was dismissed since no judicial interference in to the award was warranted in absence of any infirmity in the said award. M [LexDoc Id : 337646]
ING Vysya Bank Ltd. vs Modern India Ltd. and Anr.
Dispute between Licensor and licensee-Exclusive Jurisdiction-A petition filed under s.9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 was dismissed since the Small causes court had been conferred an exclusive and [LexDoc Id : 338476]
HC (Bombay)
2008
Mikuni Corporation vs Ucal Fuel Systems Ltd. and Ors.
Place of arbitration-Jurisdiction of Court-The place where arbitration may take place was not relevant for deciding jurisdiction of the Court for the purpose of s. 9 of the Arbitration and Conc [LexDoc Id : 337647]
Jeweltouch India (P) Ltd. vs Naheed Hafeez Quraishi and Ors.
Arbitration-Interim injunction-An interim injunction restraining the respondent from creating third party rights in respect of a plot of land in question was granted to the petition [LexDoc Id : 340445]
Oceanic Dehydrates (P) Ltd. vs UOI and Anr.
Challenge to award-Legal misconduct by arbitrator-An award was partially set aside to the extent it was grossly prejudiced on account of the legal misconduct committed by the arbitrator. The arbitrato [LexDoc Id : 337644]
Municipal Corpn. of Delhi vs D. Pal and Company
Arbitration award-Grounds of challenge-The challenge to the arbitration award was dismissed as prescribed procedure stipulated in the agreement was followed for appointment of sole arbitrat [LexDoc Id : 341150]
HC (Delhi)
2008
Mitra S.K. (P) Ltd. vs Inspectorate Griffith India (P) Ltd.
Arbitration-Application for interim injunction rejected-The high court denied to interfere with the lower court's order since that court had rightly held that the case was not fit for granting interim injun [LexDoc Id : 347960]
HC (Orissa)
2008
J.C. Budhraja vs Orissa Mining Corpn. Ltd. and Anr.
Claim statement-Period of limitation-An arbitrator had erred in assuming that all claims made in the claim statement had been filed within the period of limitation. Consequently, a part o [LexDoc Id : 334105]
SC
2008
State of Punjab and Anr. vs Jalour Singh and Ors.
Lok Adalats-Determination of reference-Lok Adalats have no adjudicatory or judicial functions. Further, a Lok Adalat only determines a reference on the basis of a compromise or settlement b [LexDoc Id : 332882]
SC
2008
Patitapaban Mohapatra vs S.E. Eastern Circle and Ors.
Arbitration-Existence of arbitration clause-In case of a dispute regarding the existence of arbitration clause in the agreement between the parties, the Chief Justice or his designate had to dec [LexDoc Id : 347962]
HC (Orissa)
2008
Paragon Constructions India (P) Ltd. vs UOI and Anr.
Adjudication of claim-Escalation-The adjudication of a claim made on account of escalation attributable to delay on the part of the respondent and its agencies was directed for fresh [LexDoc Id : 335699]
