| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 269 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Interore Fertichem Resources SA vs MMTC of India Ltd.
Setting aside of award-Deficiencies-An award was set aside when it was found to be completely arbitrary, perverse, opposed to justice and morality, and contrary to pleadings of parties, [LexDoc Id : 331105]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2007 |
Impex Corpn. and Ors. vs Elenjikal Aquamarine Exports Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 345178]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2007 |
N.R. Constructions (P) Ltd. vs Ram Badan Singh and Ors.
Adjustment of cross award-No execution of cross decrees-The provisions of Order XXI Rule 18 & 19 of CPC 1908 are not applicable in case of adjustment of cross award. Therefore, applications filed in respect [LexDoc Id : 327183]
|
SC |
2007 |
State of Gujarat vs Spun Pipe and Construction Co. (Baroda) (P) Ltd.
Appeal against arbitral award-Filing objections-An order of the Additional district judge rejecting further objections of the petitioner against an award was set aside. The petitioner had filed its [LexDoc Id : 338484]
|
HC (Gujarat) |
2007 |
B.K. Gupta vs UOI
Appointment of arbitrator-Existence of arbitration clause-An arbitration agreement was valid until the dispute in question was fully resolved. Consequently, the authority of the parties to refer their dispute [LexDoc Id : 335695]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2007 |
Citibank N.A vs Tlc Marketing Plc. and Anr.
Appointment of sole arbitrator-Inexpensive and efficacious proceedings-The Supreme court had full authority to appoint a sole arbitrator as per the nature of the arbitration agreement along with facts and circumstances. C [LexDoc Id : 333269]
|
SC |
2007 |
UOI vs Ajabul Biswas
Appeal against an arbitral award-Rate of interest, Amount of compensation-The Single Judge’s order which, inter alia, reduced the rate of interest granted by the arbitrator and awarded compensation for idle charges of labour [LexDoc Id : 341506]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2007 |
Bharat Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. vs Rajarajeswari Agency
Setting aside of award-Power of court-No court had the power to substitute its own evaluation in place of the award of the arbitrator and conclude that the arbitrator had acted contrary to [LexDoc Id : 334441]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2007 |
Utkal Galvanizers Ltd. vs Orissa Hydro Power Corpn. Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 326737]
|
SC |
2007 |
Ennore Port Ltd. vs Skanska Cementation India Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 345177]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2007 |
Lokanath Biswal vs UOI
Setting aside of arbitral award-Condonation of delay, Limitation-A writ petition assailing the District judge’s order condoning the delay under s.14 of the limitation Act 1963 was dismissed. The District judge was j [LexDoc Id : 340286]
|
HC (Orissa) |
2007 |
Era Constructions India Ltd. vs D.K. Sharma
Breach of confidentiality-Absence of evidence-A petition against the award of an arbitrator on grounds of breach of confidentiality and expiry of limitation period was dismissed in absence of any [LexDoc Id : 334102]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2007 |
Ircon International Ltd. vs Budhraja Mining and Constructions Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 330048]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2007 |
Executive Engineer and Anr. vs Bichitrananda Behera and Anr.
Interim measures by Court-Injunction-The high court allowed an appeal against the lower court’s order of injunction restraining the appellant from terminating the work order and getting t [LexDoc Id : 340285]
|
HC (Orissa) |
2007 |
Global Aviation Services (P) Ltd. vs Malaysian Airline System and Anr.
Encashment of bank guarantee-Appeal-An appeal against encashment of a bank guarantee was dismissed as the appellant could not furnish any reasonable ground for restraining invocation of [LexDoc Id : 332079]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2007 |
State of West Bengal vs Afcons Infrastructure Ltd.
Setting aside of award-Law of Limitation-An appeal against dismissal of a petition for setting aside an award was dismissed on account of law of limitation. Since the said petition had not be [LexDoc Id : 335696]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2007 |
India Trading Oil Company and Ors. vs Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. and Ors.
Arbitration agreement-Writ petition dismissed, availability of alternative remedy-The agreement existing between the parties provided for arbitration in case of dispute(s). Hence, the Single Judge had rightly dismissed the writ peti [LexDoc Id : 347472]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2007 |
M.P. Food Products Ltd. vs M.P. Agro Industries Development Corpn. Ltd.
Validity of award-Dispute regarding fee-An award that was well reasoned and not perverse could not be set aside merely because the arbitrator demanded additional fee for adjudication of coun [LexDoc Id : 341507]
|
HC (Madhya Pradesh) |
2007 |
Motor and General Finance Ltd. vs Singh Construction Co. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 345179]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2007 |
Seema Bhatia vs Yamaha Motor India (P) Ltd.
Arbitration-Subsistence of arbitration clause-The petitioner was right in contending that the parties were no longer governed by the arbitration clause. The original agreement that had been execut [LexDoc Id : 337650]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2007 |
Anil Kumar Ahuja vs K.C. Sethi and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 345174]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2007 |
Vaish Brothers vs UOI
Jurisdiction of arbitrator-Construction of a contract-An error commited by an arbitrator in construction of a contract was an error within his jurisdiction whereas if the said construction wandered outsid [LexDoc Id : 334430]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2007 |
Mohd. Rafi vs UOI
[LexDoc Id : 332073]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2007 |
Vishwa Nath Agrawal and Ors. vs Satyawati Devi and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 330049]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2007 |
UOI vs S.R. Construction Co. and Anr.
Application to set aside award-Appropriate forum-An application for setting aside an award could only be filed in a court which would have had jurisdiction to entertain a suit if there had been no ar [LexDoc Id : 330033]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2007 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
