| First | 1 | 2 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 33 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Central Bureau of Investigation and Anr. vs D.P. Singh
[LexDoc Id : 378219]
|
SC |
2009 |
Tika Ram, Saroj Agarwal, Shivaji Nagar Sahakari Girah Nirman Samiti Ltd., Pratap Sahakari Grih Nirman Samiti Ltd., Shama Timber Works, Ganga Bux Singh, Janta Steel Industry, Sachin Surkhi Udyog and Ors. vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 371000]
|
SC |
2009 |
Relating to Criminal Intimidation, In re vs UOI and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 374326]
|
SC |
2009 |
Sudhir Shantilal Mehta vs Central Bureau of Investigation
Discounting and rediscounting of bills of exchange illegally-Board of Directors of bank not ratifying the transaction-The first, second and eighth accused were officials of a bank, which was allegedly facilitated to the third accused, a share dealer, to divert and def [LexDoc Id : 368929]
|
SC |
2009 |
K. Raamaselvam and Ors. vs Indian Overseas Bank and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 387451]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2009 |
Assistant Commissioner (CT), Commissioner of Industries, State of Andhra Pradesh, CTO, Surya Chandra Paper Mills Ltd. and Anr. vs Amara Raja Batteries Ltd., Zuari Cements Ltd., Coastal Paper, Orient Cement and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 368009]
|
SC |
2009 |
State of Kerala and Anr. vs Kerala State Unit and Ors.
Malayora Karshaka Federation vs Niyamavedi and Ors.
M. Mohan Kumar vs P. Nalla Thampy Thera and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 367890]
|
SC |
2009 |
Government of Andhra Pradesh and Anr. vs N. Ramanaiah
[LexDoc Id : 362978]
|
SC |
2009 |
Villianur Iyarkkai Padukappu Maiyam vs UOI and Ors.
Challenge to the award of the contract in favour of the Developer-Maintainability of PIL-On a preliminary objection regarding locus standi of the appellant to challenge the Award of the Contract for the development of the Pondicherry Port [LexDoc Id : 362926]
|
SC |
2009 |
Ravi Development vs Shree Krishna Prathisthan and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 362621]
|
SC |
2009 |
Pradeep Chaudhary and Ors. vs UOI and Anr.
Formation of a new State-Power of Parliament to introduce a Bill-The Supreme Court, in a writ petition against inclusion of District of Haridwar in the State of Uttaranchal, noted the provisions of article 3 of the [LexDoc Id : 362208]
|
SC |
2009 |
Chandrakant Hargovindas Shah vs Deputy Commissioner of Police and Anr.
Sale and purchase of arms and ammunition by a licensee-Orders cancelling licence justified considering frequency of transactions-Sale and purchase of arms and ammunition by a licensee per se was not prohibited. But having regard to the provisions of the Arms Act 1959 and the pur [LexDoc Id : 362155]
|
SC |
2009 |
Paras Nath Singh vs State of Bihar and Ors.
Cancellation of First Time Bound Promotion-Supreme Courts approach towards such undertaking-The Supreme Court, noting the undertaking given by the appellant that in the event First Time Bound Promotion was cancelled, in that case, he would be [LexDoc Id : 361214]
|
SC |
2009 |
Bihar State Electricity Board vs Pulak Enterprises and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 366724]
|
SC |
2009 |
V.V.S. Rama Sharma and Ors. vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.
Purchase of insurance stamps from outside the State-Applicability of s.69 of Stamp Act-The purchase of stamps by the appellants from the stamp vendors, outside of State of Uttar Pradesh, and not from the Treasury Office of the State coul [LexDoc Id : 360885]
|
SC |
2009 |
A.P. Public Service Commission vs Baloji Badhavath and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 360681]
|
SC |
2009 |
Nerkar Madhukar Jagannath vs Kopargaon Municipal Council, Madhavrao K. Adhav and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 360422]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Association of Resident of MHOW (ROM) and Anr. vs Delimitation Commission of India and Ors.
Delimitation of Parliamentary Constituencies-Notification of delimitation to be treated as law-The Supreme Court, while considering the question whether the Delimitation Commission had complied with the mandatory requirement as provided for in s [LexDoc Id : 359955]
|
SC |
2009 |
Nair Service Society vs T. Beermasthan and Ors.
Selection of candidates-Treating entire number of vacancies as one unit by high court not justified-The Supreme Court, whilst considering whether a correct construction had been placed on rule 14 to rule 17 of the Kerala State and Subordinate Service [LexDoc Id : 359956]
|
SC |
2009 |
Bank of India and Anr. vs K. Mohandas and Ors., N.U. Kurup and Ors. vs Union Bank of India and Ors., Punjab and Sind Bank and Ors. vs Baldev Singh,Punjab National Bank vs C.J. Singh and Ors. and Punjab National Bank vs Balwant Rai Girdhar and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 366453]
|
SC |
2009 |
K.A. Nagamani vs Indian Airlines and Ors.
Recruitment and Promotion Rules-Merger of cadres-The Supreme Court, in response to the question whether the Recruitment and Promotion Rules were statutory in nature or mere administrative instruction [LexDoc Id : 359784]
|
SC |
2009 |
Rani Lakshmi Bai Kshetriya Gramin Bank vs Jagdish Sharan Varshney and Ors.
Duty to pass reasoned order-Affirmation vis-à-vis reversal-The Supreme Court opined that the order of affirmation need not contain as elaborate reasons as an order of reversal, but that, however, did not mean [LexDoc Id : 359785]
|
SC |
2009 |
U.T. Chandigarh Administration and Anr. vs Amarjeet Singh and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 359167]
|
SC |
2009 |
Gajanan P. Lasure and Aniket Bhagwanrao Deshkar vs Director General of Police Maharashtra State, State of Maharashtra and Anr.
[LexDoc Id : 359029]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
Prakash Ganpat Sawant vs Ravindra Babaji Satam and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 359025]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2009 |
| |
| First | 1 | 2 | Next | Last |
| |
